Bulchandani Supriya, Coats Alfred C, Gallos Ioannis D, Toozs-Hobson Philip, Parsons Matthew
Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, UK; University Hospitals Coventry & Warwickshire, UK.
Clinical Research Consultant, TX, USA.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017 Mar;210:319-324. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.01.006. Epub 2017 Jan 9.
Studies have demonstrated a strong positive correlation between bladder capacity and total volume voided in asymptomatic non-pregnant women. Therefore, to adequately characterise the normative data, it was important to compare bladder capacity vs. 24-h volume (V) relationships in our pregnant study population. Our objectives were to (1) collect normative bladder diary measurements from asymptomatic primigravid women, (2) investigate the relationship between these measurements and gestation of pregnancy, and (4) compare these normative measurements from pregnant women with those from asymptomatic non-pregnant women. We focused on measures of "bladder capacity" [average ("V") and maximum volume per void ("V")], ("V"), and voiding frequency ("F").
Three-day bladder diaries were collected from 41 primigravid women, one three-day diary per trimester. We compared our pregnant data with non-pregnant data previously collected by Amundsen et al. using identical methods. Relationship between variables analysed using the Kruskal-Wallace and Mann-Whitney tests.
We found no significant differences across trimesters among bladder diary measurements (p-values: F=0.711;V=0.912;V=0.894, and V=0.675). A comparison between pregnant and non-pregnant data showed no significant difference between F, but a significantly lower V, V and V in pregnant women. Regression analysis showed no significant differences between the pregnant and non-pregnant, V vs. bladder capacity relationships.
Pregnancy results in smaller bladder capacities and lower V, with a normal relationship between V and bladder capacity, maintaining normal voiding frequency. We used our data to construct a nomogram to help clinicians compare the relative contributions of increased V and reduced bladder capacity to increased F.
研究表明,无症状非妊娠女性的膀胱容量与排尿总量之间存在很强的正相关。因此,为了充分描述规范数据,在我们的妊娠研究人群中比较膀胱容量与24小时尿量(V)的关系很重要。我们的目标是:(1)收集无症状初孕妇的规范膀胱日记测量数据;(2)研究这些测量数据与妊娠孕周之间的关系;(4)将这些孕妇的规范测量数据与无症状非妊娠女性的进行比较。我们重点关注“膀胱容量”的测量指标[平均(“V”)和每次排尿的最大尿量(“V”)]、(“V”)以及排尿频率(“F”)。
从41名初孕妇中收集了为期三天的膀胱日记,每个孕期一份为期三天的日记。我们使用相同方法将我们的妊娠数据与阿蒙森等人之前收集的非妊娠数据进行了比较。使用Kruskal-Wallace检验和Mann-Whitney检验分析变量之间的关系。
我们发现各孕期的膀胱日记测量值之间无显著差异(p值:F = 0.711;V = 0.912;V = 0.894,V = 0.675)。妊娠数据与非妊娠数据的比较显示,F无显著差异,但孕妇的V、V和V显著更低。回归分析显示,妊娠与非妊娠状态下,V与膀胱容量的关系无显著差异。
妊娠导致膀胱容量变小、V降低,V与膀胱容量之间关系正常,排尿频率保持正常。我们利用我们的数据构建了一个列线图,以帮助临床医生比较V增加和膀胱容量降低对F增加的相对贡献。