Shapiro Edward S, Gebhardt Sarah, Flatley Katie, Guard Kirra B, Fu Qiong, Leichman Erin S, Calhoon Mary Beth, Hojnoski Robin
Center for Promoting Research to Practice, Lehigh University.
Department of Student Services, Glenview School District 34.
Sch Psychol Q. 2017 Dec;32(4):509-524. doi: 10.1037/spq0000193. Epub 2017 Jan 23.
The development and psychometric qualities of a measure using teacher judgment to rate performance in reading comprehension for narrative text is described-the Rating Scales for Academic Skills-Reading Comprehension Narrative (RSAS-RCN). Sixty-five teachers from the third, fourth, and fifth grades of 8 elementary schools completed the measure on 177 students. Each teacher rated students who had been identified through school-based universal screening to be below the 25th percentile, between the 25th and 74th percentile, and at or above the 75th percentile on national normative standards. Results indicated the RSAS-RCN has strong to moderate evidence of (a) 1-week test-retest reliability, (b) concurrent validity with the Group Reading Assessment and Diagnostic Evaluation (GRADE) and end of year state assessment in reading, and (c) significant classification accuracy across student ability levels. Principal component analysis and item response theory (Rasch modeling) indicate the RSAS-RCN is comprised of a single general dimension. Overall, this examination of the RSAS-RCN suggests teacher judgment may be a potentially valuable tool in assessing reading comprehension among upper elementary school students. (PsycINFO Database Record
本文描述了一种使用教师判断来评定记叙文阅读理解表现的测评工具——学术技能评定量表-记叙文阅读理解(RSAS-RCN)的开发及其心理测量学特性。来自8所小学三、四、五年级的65名教师对177名学生进行了该测评。每位教师对那些经校内普遍筛查确定在全国常模标准中处于第25百分位以下、第25至74百分位之间以及第75百分位及以上的学生进行了评定。结果表明,RSAS-RCN有充分到中等程度的证据支持:(a)1周的重测信度;(b)与团体阅读评估与诊断评价(GRADE)以及阅读年终州级评估的同时效度;(c)在不同学生能力水平上具有显著的分类准确性。主成分分析和项目反应理论(拉施模型)表明RSAS-RCN由单一的一般维度构成。总体而言,对RSAS-RCN的这项考察表明,教师判断可能是评估小学高年级学生阅读理解的一个潜在有价值的工具。(PsycINFO数据库记录