Petrini Stefano, Pierini Ilaria, Giammarioli Monica, Feliziani Francesco, De Mia Gian Mario
Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale dell'Umbria e delle Marche, Perugia, Italy.
J Vet Diagn Invest. 2017 Mar;29(2):254-257. doi: 10.1177/1040638716686393. Epub 2017 Jan 24.
We evaluated the use of oral fluid as an alternative to serum samples for Classical swine fever virus (CSFV) detection. Individual oral fluid and serum samples were collected at different times post-infection from pigs that were experimentally inoculated with CSFV Alfort 187 strain. We found no evidence of CSFV neutralizing antibodies in swine oral fluid samples under our experimental conditions. In contrast, real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction could detect CSFV nucleic acid from the oral fluid as early as 8 d postinfection, which also coincided with the time of initial detection in blood samples. The probability of CSFV detection in oral fluid was identical or even higher than in the corresponding blood sample. Our results support the feasibility of using this sampling method for CSFV genome detection, which may represent an additional cost-effective tool for CSF control.
我们评估了使用口腔液替代血清样本用于检测猪瘟病毒(CSFV)的可行性。在实验性接种CSFV阿尔福特187株的猪感染后的不同时间点,采集个体口腔液和血清样本。在我们的实验条件下,未在猪口腔液样本中发现CSFV中和抗体的证据。相比之下,实时逆转录聚合酶链反应最早可在感染后8天从口腔液中检测到CSFV核酸,这也与血液样本中最初检测到的时间一致。在口腔液中检测到CSFV的概率与相应血液样本相同,甚至更高。我们的结果支持使用这种采样方法进行CSFV基因组检测的可行性,这可能是一种用于猪瘟防控的额外的经济有效工具。