医院和医疗服务提供者结果评估中的风险调整挑战。 - Suppr | 超能文献

文献检索
文档翻译
深度研究
学术资讯

Zotero 插件

邀请有礼
套餐&价格
历史记录

应用&插件

Zotero 插件浏览器插件 Mac 客户端 Windows 客户端微信小程序

定价

高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包

服务

文献检索文档翻译深度研究 API 文档 MCP 服务

关于我们

关于 Suppr 公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款

关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究

粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1

Challenges in Risk Adjustment for Hospital and Provider Outcomes Assessment.医院和医疗服务提供者结果评估中的风险调整挑战。

Circulation. 2017 Jan 24;135(4):317-319. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.025653.

2

Risk adjustment of ischemic stroke outcomes for comparing hospital performance: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association.比较医院绩效的缺血性脑卒中结局风险调整：美国心脏协会/美国卒中协会的医疗保健专业人员声明。

Stroke. 2014 Mar;45(3):918-44. doi: 10.1161/01.str.0000441948.35804.77. Epub 2014 Jan 23.

3

100 top hospitals. Cardiovascular benchmarks.100家顶级医院。心血管疾病基准。

Mod Healthc. 2001 Feb 26;Suppl:27-9.

4

Monitoring performance improvement using decision support systems.使用决策支持系统监测绩效改进。

J AHIMA. 1998 Nov-Dec;69(10):36-9; quiz 41-2.

5

Network's cardiology data help member groups benchmark performance, market services.

Data Strateg Benchmarks. 1997 Nov;1(5):72-5.

6

Identifying high-quality hospitals: consult the ratings or flip a coin?

Arch Intern Med. 2007 Jul 9;167(13):1342-4. doi: 10.1001/archinte.167.13.1342.

7

Use these benchmarks to evaluate hospital cardiovascular care.使用这些基准来评估医院的心血管护理。

Capitation Rates Data. 2002 May;7(5):55-7.

8

New cardiac project is first to tackle clinical and operational issues.新的心脏项目首先要解决临床和运营问题。

Healthc Benchmarks. 2001 Jan;8(1):1-12.

9

Using past performance to guide referrals for heart transplantation.

J Heart Lung Transplant. 2010 Aug;29(8):908-9. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2010.04.011. Epub 2010 May 26.

10

The public eye. Published outcomes reports effect change at Pa. hospitals.

Mod Healthc. 1997 Feb 17;27(7):140, 155.

引用本文的文献

1

Influence of Major Adverse Events on Procedural Selection for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Insights From the Veterans Affairs Clinical Assessment Reporting and Tracking Program.主要不良事件对经皮冠状动脉介入治疗程序选择的影响：来自退伍军人事务部临床评估报告与跟踪项目的见解

J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2022 Oct 21;1(6):100460. doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2022.100460. eCollection 2022 Nov-Dec.

2

Hospital Characteristics and Early Enrollment Trends in the American College of Cardiology Voluntary Public Reporting Program.医院特征与美国心脏病学会自愿公开报告计划的早期参与趋势。

JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Feb 1;5(2):e2147903. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.47903.

3

本文引用的文献

1

Association of public reporting for percutaneous coronary intervention with utilization and outcomes among Medicare beneficiaries with acute myocardial infarction.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的公共报告与医疗保险受益人的急性心肌梗死患者的利用和结局的关联。

JAMA. 2012 Oct 10;308(14):1460-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.12922.

2

Surgical candidacy and selection biases in nonemergent left main stenting: implications for observational studies.非紧急情况下左主干支架置入术的手术适应证和选择偏倚：对观察性研究的影响。

JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 Sep;4(9):1020-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2011.06.010.

3

Accountability measures--using measurement to promote quality improvement.

A detailed analysis of patients included in the Summary Hospital-level Mortality Indicator (SHMI) for myocardial infarction (MI)-all is not what it seems?

对纳入心肌梗死（MI）全因汇总医院病死率指标（SHMI）的患者进行详细分析——并非表面所见？

BMJ Open Qual. 2020 Jun;9(2). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2019-000836.

4

Inadequate Surrogates for Imperfect Quality Measures.不完美质量指标的不充分替代指标。

Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Sep;11(9):e007216. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.118.007216.

5

Public Reporting of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Outcomes: Moving Beyond the Status Quo.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗结果的公众报告：超越现状。

JAMA Cardiol. 2018 Jul 1;3(7):635-640. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2018.0947.

6

Public Reporting II: State of the Art-Current Public Reporting in Cardiovascular Medicine.公共报告II：心血管医学领域的最新技术——当前的公共报告

Circulation. 2017 May 9;135(19):1772-1774. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.026553.

问责措施——利用衡量来促进质量改进。

N Engl J Med. 2010 Aug 12;363(7):683-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsb1002320. Epub 2010 Jun 23.

4

Standards for statistical models used for public reporting of health outcomes: an American Heart Association Scientific Statement from the Quality of Care and Outcomes Research Interdisciplinary Writing Group: cosponsored by the Council on Epidemiology and Prevention and the Stroke Council. Endorsed by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.用于健康结果公开报告的统计模型标准：美国心脏协会护理质量与结果研究跨学科写作小组的科学声明：由流行病学与预防委员会和中风委员会共同发起。美国心脏病学会基金会认可。

Circulation. 2006 Jan 24;113(3):456-62. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.170769. Epub 2005 Dec 19.

5

Improving the statistical approach to health care provider profiling.改进医疗服务提供者概况分析的统计方法。

Ann Intern Med. 1997 Oct 15;127(8 Pt 2):764-8. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-127-8_part_2-199710151-00065.

医院和医疗服务提供者结果评估中的风险调整挑战。 - Suppr | 超能文献

Challenges in Risk Adjustment for Hospital and Provider Outcomes Assessment.

作者信息

Weintraub William S, Garratt Kirk N

机构信息

From Christiana Care Health System, Newark, DE (W.S.W., K.N.G.).

出版信息

Circulation. 2017 Jan 24;135(4):317-319. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.025653.

DOI:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.025653

原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5505496/

Abstract

摘要