Isla Dolores, De Castro Javier, Juan Oscar, Grau Santiago, Orofino Javier, Gordo Rocío, Rubio-Terrés Carlos, Rubio-Rodríguez Darío
Medical Oncology Department, Clinical Universitary Hospital Lozano Blesa, Zaragoza.
Medical Oncology Department, Universitary Hospital La Paz, Madrid.
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2016 Dec 30;9:31-38. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S121093. eCollection 2017.
Epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) are an established treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with EGFR mutation. According to published meta-analyses, no significant efficacy differences have been demonstrated between erlotinib and afatinib. However, the incidence of EGFR-TKI-related adverse events (AEs) was lower with erlotinib. This study compares the cost of management of the AEs associated with these two drugs from the perspective of the Spanish National Health System (NHS).
The frequency of AEs was established from a recently published meta-analysis. In Spain, the daily cost of both drugs can be considered similar; as a result, only the costs of management of the AEs were considered. Costs and resource utilization in the management of the AEs were estimated by a panel of Spanish oncologists and from studies previously carried out in Spain. A probabilistic analysis was performed based on a Monte Carlo simulation.
The model generated 1,000 simulations. The total cost per patient treated with erlotinib and afatinib was €657.44 and €1,272.15, respectively. With erlotinib, the cost per patient and per AE of grades ≤2 and ≥3 was €550.86 and €106.58, respectively, whereas the cost with afatinib was €980.63 and €291.52, respectively. The reduction in the number of AEs with erlotinib could avoid a mean cost for the NHS of €614.71 (95% CI: €342.57-881.29) per patient.
In advanced EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC patients, first-line treatment with erlotinib could reduce health care costs for the NHS, due to a decrease in the AE rate compared with afatinib. In long-term treatments, the avoidance of complications and the lowering of costs associated with the management of AEs are relevant factors that contribute to the sustainability of the health system.
表皮生长因子受体酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(EGFR-TKIs)是治疗具有EGFR突变的晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的既定疗法。根据已发表的荟萃分析,厄洛替尼和阿法替尼之间未显示出显著的疗效差异。然而,厄洛替尼导致的EGFR-TKI相关不良事件(AE)发生率较低。本研究从西班牙国家卫生系统(NHS)的角度比较了这两种药物相关AE的管理成本。
AE的发生频率来自最近发表的一项荟萃分析。在西班牙,这两种药物的每日成本可视为相似;因此,仅考虑AE的管理成本。AE管理中的成本和资源利用由一组西班牙肿瘤学家根据之前在西班牙进行的研究进行估算。基于蒙特卡洛模拟进行概率分析。
该模型生成了1000次模拟。接受厄洛替尼和阿法替尼治疗的每位患者的总成本分别为657.44欧元和1272.15欧元。使用厄洛替尼时,≤2级和≥3级AE的每位患者成本和每次AE成本分别为550.86欧元和106.58欧元,而使用阿法替尼时分别为980.63欧元和291.52欧元。厄洛替尼导致的AE数量减少可为NHS避免每位患者平均614.71欧元(95%CI:342.57 - 881.29欧元)的成本。
在晚期EGFR突变阳性NSCLC患者中,与阿法替尼相比,厄洛替尼一线治疗可降低AE发生率,从而降低NHS的医疗成本。在长期治疗中,避免并发症以及降低与AE管理相关的成本是有助于卫生系统可持续性的相关因素。