Vanderlei Franciele M, de Albuquerque Maíra C, de Almeida Aline C, Machado Aryane F, Netto Jayme, Pastre Carlos M
Laboratory of Sports Physiotherapy, Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Science and Technology, São Paulo State University (UNESP) Presidente Prudente, São Paulo, Brazil.
Department of Physical Therapy, São Paulo State University (UNESP) Presidente Prudente, São Paulo, Brazil.
J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2017 Oct;57(10):1267-1275. doi: 10.23736/S0022-4707.17.06841-4. Epub 2017 Jan 23.
Cold water immersion (CWI) is a commonly used recuperative strategy. However there is a lack of standardization of protocols considering the duration and temperature of application of the technique and the stress model. Therefore it is important to study the issue of dose response in a specific stress model. Thus the objective was to analyze and compare the effects of CWI during intense post-exercise recovery using different durations and temperatures of immersion.
One hundred and five male individuals were divided into five groups: one control group (CG) and four recovery groups (G1: 5' at 9±1 °C; G2: 5' at 14±1 °C; G3: 15' at 9±1 °C; G4: 15' at 14±1 °C). The volunteers were submitted to an exhaustion protocol that consisted of a jump program and the Wingate Test. Immediately after the exhaustion protocol, the volunteers were directed to a tank with water and ice, where they were immersed for the recovery procedure, during which blood samples were collected for later lactate and creatine kinase (CK) analysis. Variables were collected prior to the exercise and 24, 48, 72, and 96 hours after its completion.
For the CK concentration, 15 minutes at 14 °C was the best intervention option, considering the values at 72 hours after exercise, while for the moment of peak lactate an advantage was observed for immersion for 5 minutes at 14 °C. Regarding the perception of recovery, CWI for 5 minutes at 14 °C performed better long-term, from the time of the intervention to 96 hours post-exercise. For pain, no form of immersion responded better than the CG at the immediately post-intervention moment.
There were no differences in behavior between the CWI intervention groups for the outcomes studied.
冷水浸泡(CWI)是一种常用的恢复策略。然而,考虑到该技术应用的持续时间、温度以及应激模型,目前缺乏相关方案的标准化。因此,在特定应激模型中研究剂量反应问题很重要。本研究的目的是分析和比较在剧烈运动后恢复期间,使用不同浸泡持续时间和温度的冷水浸泡的效果。
105名男性个体被分为五组:一个对照组(CG)和四个恢复组(G1:9±1°C浸泡5分钟;G2:14±1°C浸泡5分钟;G3:9±1°C浸泡15分钟;G4:14±1°C浸泡15分钟)。志愿者们接受了一项由跳跃计划和温盖特测试组成的疲劳方案。在疲劳方案结束后,志愿者们被引导至装有水和冰的水箱中,在那里他们进行浸泡以进行恢复过程,在此期间采集血样用于后续乳酸和肌酸激酶(CK)分析。在运动前以及运动完成后的24、48、72和96小时收集变量。
对于CK浓度,考虑运动后72小时的值,14°C浸泡15分钟是最佳干预选项,而对于乳酸峰值时刻,14°C浸泡5分钟具有优势。关于恢复感知,从干预时刻到运动后96小时,14°C浸泡5分钟的长期效果更好。对于疼痛,在干预后即刻,没有任何一种浸泡形式的反应比对照组更好。
在所研究的结果方面,CWI干预组之间的行为没有差异。