Hokuto Daisuke, Nomi Takeo, Yasuda Satoshi, Kawaguchi Chihiro, Yoshikawa Takahiro, Ishioka Kohei, Obara Shinsaku, Yamada Takatsugu, Kanehiro Hiromichi
Department of Surgery, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-cho, Kashihara-shi, 634-8522 Nara, Japan.
Department of Surgery, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-cho, Kashihara-shi, 634-8522 Nara, Japan.
HPB (Oxford). 2017 Apr;19(4):359-364. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2016.12.005. Epub 2017 Jan 20.
Prophylactic drainage after liver resection remains a common practice amongst hepatic surgeons. However, there is little information about the optimal timing of drain removal.
From April 2008 to December 2012 (conventional group), the drains were removed based on the treating surgeon's view. From January 2013 to April 2016 (ERP group), the drains were removed on POD 3 if the bile concentration of the drain discharge was less than three times the serum bilirubin on POD 3, and the amount of drain discharge was <500 ml on POD 3. The postoperative outcomes of the two groups were compared using one-to-one propensity score-matching analysis.
One hundred nine patients were extracted from ERP group (n = 226) and conventional group (n = 246). The time to drain removal was significantly shorter in the ERP group than in the conventional group (3 days vs. 5 days, P < 0.001). The frequency of delayed bile leakage or the appearance of symptomatic abdominal fluid collection after drain removal did not differ between the two groups (3% vs. 4%, P = 0.791).
Drain removal on POD 3 based on the volume and bile concentration is safe.
肝切除术后预防性引流仍是肝脏外科医生常用的做法。然而,关于最佳拔管时机的信息却很少。
2008年4月至2012年12月(传统组),根据主刀医生的意见拔管。2013年1月至2016年4月(早期拔管组),如果术后第3天引流液胆汁浓度低于术后第3天血清胆红素的3倍,且术后第3天引流量<500 ml,则在术后第3天拔管。采用一对一倾向评分匹配分析比较两组的术后结局。
从早期拔管组(n = 226)和传统组(n = 246)中各抽取109例患者。早期拔管组的拔管时间明显短于传统组(3天对5天,P < 0.001)。两组拔管后延迟胆漏或出现有症状腹腔积液的频率无差异(3%对4%,P = 0.791)。
根据引流量和胆汁浓度在术后第3天拔管是安全的。