Suppr超能文献

挑战 60%的任意截分分数:来自临床前口腔修复学课程的标准设定证据。

Challenging the arbitrary cutoff score of 60%: Standard setting evidence from preclinical Operative Dentistry course.

机构信息

a Faculty of Dentistry , King Abdulaziz University , Jeddah , Saudi Arabia.

b Faculty of Medicine , King Abdulaziz University , Jeddah , Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

Med Teach. 2017 Apr;39(sup1):S75-S79. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2016.1254752. Epub 2017 Jan 25.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

This paper conducted standard setting (SS) (Angoff and Hofstee methods) to determine cutoff scores for summative examinations and to compare the derived passing levels to the existing fixed passing score of 60% in the Faculty of Dentistry at King Abdulaziz University.

METHODS

Historic performance data for final examinations in preclinical Operative Dentistry course were used by four raters to conduct both Angoff and Hofstee methods to determine the cut off scores for three academic years (2012, 2013, and 2014).

RESULTS

Both methods yielded higher than 60% cut off scores for each year. For the first examination of academic year 2012, the cutoff score was 64.75, while it was 63.5 for year 2013, and 66.75 for the last academic year of 2014. Hofstee scores were 64.5, 65.25, and 62.25 consecutively for years 2012 through 2014.

CONCLUSIONS

Using Angoff or Hofstee methods, yielded higher than the fixed 60% passing score currently used by the dental school. The use of Angoff method alone is encouraged as there were limitations to using the Hofstee method to determine the cut off score. This finding provides preliminary support to use evidence-based SS methods to determine the cutoff score for the whole Dentistry program.

摘要

简介

本文采用标准设定(SS)(Angoff 和 Hofstee 方法)来确定总结性考试的及格分数,并将得出的及格分数与沙特阿卜杜勒阿齐兹大学牙科学院目前 60%的固定及格分数进行比较。

方法

使用四名评分员对临床前口腔修复学课程的期末考试历史成绩进行分析,分别采用 Angoff 和 Hofstee 方法来确定三个学年(2012、2013 和 2014 年)的截止分数。

结果

两种方法都为每年产生了高于 60%的截止分数。对于 2012 学年的第一次考试,截止分数为 64.75,而 2013 年为 63.5,2014 年为最后一学年为 66.75。Hofstee 分数依次为 2012 年至 2014 年的 64.5、65.25 和 62.25。

结论

使用 Angoff 或 Hofstee 方法得出的分数高于牙科学院目前使用的固定 60%及格分数。鼓励单独使用 Angoff 方法,因为 Hofstee 方法在确定截止分数方面存在局限性。这一发现初步支持使用基于证据的 SS 方法来确定整个牙科项目的截止分数。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验