Lifson Alan R, Grund Birgit, Gardner Edward M, Kaplan Richard, Denning Eileen, Engen Nicole, Carey Catherine L, Chen Fabian, Dao Sounkalo, Florence Eric, Sanz Jesus, Emery Sean
aUniversity of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota bDenver Public Health, Denver, Colorado, USA cDesmond Tutu HIV Foundation, Cape Town, South Africa dKirby Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia eRoyal Berkshire Hospital, Reading, Berkshire, UK fCentre Universitaire de Recherche Clinique, Bamako, Mali gInstitute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium hHospital Universitario de la Princessa, Madrid, Spain.
AIDS. 2017 Apr 24;31(7):953-963. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000001417.
To determine if immediate compared to deferred initiation of antiretroviral therapy (ART) in healthy persons living with HIV had a more favorable impact on health-related quality of life (QOL), or self-assessed physical, mental, and overall health status.
QOL was measured in the Strategic Timing of Antiretroviral Therapy study, which randomized healthy ART-naive persons living with HIV with CD4 cell counts above 500 cells/μl from 35 countries to immediate versus deferred ART.
At baseline, months 4 and 12, then annually, participants completed a visual analog scale (VAS) for 'perceived current health' and the Short-Form 12-Item Health Survey version 2 from which the following were computed: general health perception; physical component summary (PCS); and mental component summary (MCS); the VAS and general health were rated from 0 (lowest) to 100 (highest).
QOL at study entry was high (mean scores: VAS = 80.9, general health = 72.5, PCS = 53.7, MCS = 48.2). Over a mean follow-up of 3 years, changes in all QOL measures favored the immediate group (P < 0.001); estimated differences were as follows: VAS = 1.9, general health = 3.6, PCS = 0.8, MCS = 0.9. When QOL changes were assessed across various demographic and clinical subgroups, treatment differences continued to favor the immediate group. QOL was poorer in those experiencing primary outcomes; however, when excluding those with primary events, results remained favorable for immediate ART recipients.
In an international randomized trial in ART-naive participants with above 500 CD4 cells/μl, there were modest but significant improvements in self-assessed QOL among those initiating ART immediately compared to deferring treatment, supporting patient-perceived health benefits of initiating ART as soon as possible after an HIV diagnosis.
确定与延迟启动抗逆转录病毒疗法(ART)相比,在感染HIV的健康人群中立即启动ART对健康相关生活质量(QOL)或自我评估的身体、心理和整体健康状况是否有更有利的影响。
在抗逆转录病毒治疗的战略时机研究中测量了生活质量,该研究将来自35个国家的CD4细胞计数高于500个细胞/μl且未接受过ART治疗的感染HIV的健康人群随机分为立即接受ART组和延迟接受ART组。
在基线、第4个月和第12个月,然后每年,参与者完成一份关于“当前感知健康”的视觉模拟量表(VAS)以及简短健康调查问卷第2版,从中计算出以下指标:总体健康感知;身体成分总结(PCS);以及心理成分总结(MCS);VAS和总体健康的评分范围为0(最低)至100(最高)。
研究开始时生活质量较高(平均得分:VAS = 80.9,总体健康 = 72.5,PCS = 53.7,MCS = 48.2)。在平均3年的随访中,所有生活质量指标的变化都有利于立即治疗组(P < 0.001);估计差异如下:VAS = 1.9,总体健康 = 3.6,PCS = 0.8,MCS = 0.9。当在不同的人口统计学和临床亚组中评估生活质量变化时,治疗差异仍然有利于立即治疗组。经历主要结局的人群生活质量较差;然而,排除发生主要事件的人群后,立即接受ART治疗者的结果仍然较好。
在一项针对CD4细胞计数高于500个/μl且未接受过ART治疗的参与者的国际随机试验中,与延迟治疗相比,立即启动ART治疗的参与者在自我评估的生活质量方面有适度但显著的改善,这支持了在HIV诊断后尽快启动ART治疗对患者感知健康有益的观点。