Suppr超能文献

癫痫女性意外怀孕的预测因素。

Predictors of unintended pregnancy in women with epilepsy.

作者信息

Herzog Andrew G, Mandle Hannah B, Cahill Kaitlyn E, Fowler Kristen M, Hauser W Allen

机构信息

From the Harvard Neuroendocrine Unit (A.G.H., H.B.M., K.E.C., K.M.F.), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; and the Gertrude H. Sergievsky Center (W.A.H.), Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY.

出版信息

Neurology. 2017 Feb 21;88(8):728-733. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000003637. Epub 2017 Jan 25.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether rates of unintended pregnancy in women with epilepsy (WWE) vary by contraceptive category and when stratified by antiepileptic drug (AED) category.

METHODS

These retrospective data come from the Epilepsy Birth Control Registry (EBCR) web-based survey of 1,144 WWE in the community, 18-47 years of age, who provided demographic, epilepsy, AED, contraceptive, and pregnancy data. Participants indicated whether pregnancies were intended or unintended, as well as the type of contraceptive and AED used at conception. We report failure rates relative to the frequency of use of each contraceptive category in the EBCR.

RESULTS

Most WWE (78.9%) reported having at least one unintended pregnancy; 65.0% of their pregnancies were unintended. Unintended pregnancy was more common among younger, racial minority, and Hispanic WWE. Among reversible contraceptive categories, the intrauterine device had the lowest failure rate. Failure rates varied greatly on systemic hormonal contraception (HC), depending on whether oral or nonoral forms were used and especially in relation to the category of AED with which HC was combined. Oral forms had greater failure rate than nonoral forms. HC combined with enzyme-inducing AEDs had a substantially greater failure rate than HC combined with no AED or any other AED category and in comparison to barrier plus any AED category. Other AED-HC combinations, in contrast, carried lower risks than barrier.

CONCLUSIONS

Unintended pregnancy is common among WWE and may vary by contraceptive category and AED stratification. In view of the important consequences of unintended pregnancy on pregnancy outcomes, these retrospective findings warrant further prospective investigation.

摘要

目的

确定癫痫女性(WWE)意外怀孕率是否因避孕类别而异,以及按抗癫痫药物(AED)类别分层时的情况。

方法

这些回顾性数据来自癫痫节育登记处(EBCR)基于网络的对1144名社区中18 - 47岁WWE的调查,这些女性提供了人口统计学、癫痫、AED、避孕和妊娠数据。参与者指出怀孕是有意还是意外,以及受孕时使用的避孕方法和AED类型。我们报告相对于EBCR中每种避孕类别的使用频率的失败率。

结果

大多数WWE(78.9%)报告至少有一次意外怀孕;她们65.0%的怀孕是意外怀孕。意外怀孕在年轻、少数族裔和西班牙裔WWE中更为常见。在可逆避孕类别中,宫内节育器的失败率最低。系统性激素避孕(HC)的失败率差异很大,这取决于使用的是口服还是非口服形式,特别是与HC联合使用的AED类别有关。口服形式的失败率高于非口服形式。与不使用AED或任何其他AED类别联合使用的HC相比,与酶诱导性AED联合使用的HC失败率显著更高,与屏障避孕加任何AED类别相比也是如此。相比之下,其他AED - HC组合的风险低于屏障避孕。

结论

意外怀孕在WWE中很常见,可能因避孕类别和AED分层而异。鉴于意外怀孕对妊娠结局的重要影响,这些回顾性研究结果值得进一步进行前瞻性调查。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验