Enriquez-Rios Vanessa, Dumitrache Lavinia C, Downing Susanna M, Li Yang, Brown Eric J, Russell Helen R, McKinnon Peter J
Department of Genetics, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee 38105.
College of Graduate Health Sciences, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee 38163, and.
J Neurosci. 2017 Jan 25;37(4):893-905. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4213-15.2016.
The DNA damage response (DDR) orchestrates a network of cellular processes that integrates cell-cycle control and DNA repair or apoptosis, which serves to maintain genome stability. DNA-PKcs (the catalytic subunit of the DNA-dependent kinase, encoded by PRKDC), ATM (ataxia telangiectasia, mutated), and ATR (ATM and Rad3-related) are related PI3K-like protein kinases and central regulators of the DDR. Defects in these kinases have been linked to neurodegenerative or neurodevelopmental syndromes. In all cases, the key neuroprotective function of these kinases is uncertain. It also remains unclear how interactions between the three DNA damage-responsive kinases coordinate genome stability, particularly in a physiological context. Here, we used a genetic approach to identify the neural function of DNA-PKcs and the interplay between ATM and ATR during neurogenesis. We found that DNA-PKcs loss in the mouse sensitized neuronal progenitors to apoptosis after ionizing radiation because of excessive DNA damage. DNA-PKcs was also required to prevent endogenous DNA damage accumulation throughout the adult brain. In contrast, ATR coordinated the DDR during neurogenesis to direct apoptosis in cycling neural progenitors, whereas ATM regulated apoptosis in both proliferative and noncycling cells. We also found that ATR controls a DNA damage-induced G/M checkpoint in cortical progenitors, independent of ATM and DNA-PKcs. These nonoverlapping roles were further confirmed via sustained murine embryonic or cortical development after all three kinases were simultaneously inactivated. Thus, our results illustrate how DNA-PKcs, ATM, and ATR have unique and essential roles during the DDR, collectively ensuring comprehensive genome maintenance in the nervous system.
The DNA damage response (DDR) is essential for prevention of a broad spectrum of different human neurologic diseases. However, a detailed understanding of the DDR at a physiological level is lacking. In contrast to many in vitro cellular studies, here we demonstrate independent biological roles for the DDR kinases DNA-PKcs, ATM, and ATR during neurogenesis. We show that DNA-PKcs is central to DNA repair in nonproliferating cells, and restricts DNA damage accumulation, whereas ATR controls damage-induced G checkpoint control and apoptosis in proliferating cells. Conversely, ATM is critical for controlling apoptosis in immature noncycling neural cells after DNA damage. These data demonstrate functionally distinct, but cooperative, roles for each kinase in preserving genome stability in the nervous system.
DNA损伤反应(DDR)协调一系列细胞过程,这些过程整合了细胞周期控制以及DNA修复或凋亡,从而维持基因组稳定性。DNA-PKcs(DNA依赖性激酶的催化亚基,由PRKDC编码)、ATM(共济失调毛细血管扩张症突变基因)和ATR(ATM和Rad3相关蛋白)是相关的PI3K样蛋白激酶,也是DDR的核心调节因子。这些激酶的缺陷与神经退行性或神经发育综合征有关。在所有情况下,这些激酶的关键神经保护功能尚不确定。目前也不清楚这三种DNA损伤反应激酶之间的相互作用如何协调基因组稳定性,尤其是在生理环境中。在这里,我们采用遗传学方法来确定DNA-PKcs在神经发生过程中的神经功能以及ATM和ATR之间的相互作用。我们发现,由于DNA损伤过多,小鼠中DNA-PKcs的缺失使神经元祖细胞在电离辐射后对凋亡敏感。在整个成年大脑中,也需要DNA-PKcs来防止内源性DNA损伤的积累。相比之下,ATR在神经发生过程中协调DDR,以指导处于细胞周期的神经祖细胞凋亡,而ATM则调节增殖细胞和非增殖细胞中的凋亡。我们还发现,ATR在皮质祖细胞中控制DNA损伤诱导的G/M检查点,独立于ATM和DNA-PKcs。在同时使所有三种激酶失活后,通过小鼠胚胎或皮质的持续发育进一步证实了这些不重叠的作用。因此,我们的结果说明了DNA-PKcs、ATM和ATR在DDR过程中如何具有独特且重要的作用,共同确保神经系统中基因组的全面维护。
DNA损伤反应(DDR)对于预防多种不同的人类神经疾病至关重要。然而,在生理水平上对DDR的详细了解仍然缺乏。与许多体外细胞研究不同,在这里我们证明了DDR激酶DNA-PKcs、ATM和ATR在神经发生过程中具有独立的生物学作用。我们表明,DNA-PKcs对于非增殖细胞中的DNA修复至关重要,并限制DNA损伤的积累,而ATR控制增殖细胞中损伤诱导的G检查点控制和凋亡。相反,ATM对于控制DNA损伤后未成熟非增殖神经细胞中的凋亡至关重要。这些数据证明了每种激酶在维持神经系统基因组稳定性方面具有功能上不同但相互协作的作用。