Kraaij Tineke, Bredewold Obbo W, Trompet Stella, Huizinga Tom W J, Rabelink Ton J, de Craen Anton J M, Teng Y K Onno
Department of Nephrology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; Clinic for Lupus-, Vasculitis and Complement-Mediated Systemic Diseases, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Department of Gerontology and Geriatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; Department of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Lupus Sci Med. 2016 Dec 29;3(1):e000169. doi: 10.1136/lupus-2016-000169. eCollection 2016.
Current guidelines do not mention tacrolimus (TAC) as a treatment option and no consensus has been reported on the role of TAC in lupus nephritis (LN). The present study aimed to guide clinical judgement on the use of TAC in patients with LN. A meta-analysis was performed for clinical studies investigating TAC regimens in LN on the basis of treatment target (induction or maintenance), concomitant immunosuppression and quality of the data. 23 clinical studies performed in patients with LN were identified: 6 case series, 9 cohort studies, 2 case-control studies and 6 randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Of the 6 RCTs, 5 RCTs investigated TAC regimens as induction treatment and 1 RCT as maintenance treatment. Five RCTs investigated TAC in combination with steroids and 2 TAC with mycophenolate plus steroids. All RCTs were performed in patients of Asian ethnicity. In a meta-analysis, TAC regimens achieved a significantly higher total response (relative risk (RR) 1.23, 95% CI 1.12 to 1.34, p<0.05) and significantly higher complete response (RR 1.48, 95% CI 1.23 to 1.77, p<0.05). The positive outcome was predominantly defined by the largest RCT investigating TAC with mycophenolate plus steroids. Regarding safety, the occurrence of leucopoenia was significantly lower, while the occurrence of increased creatine was higher. Clinical studies on TAC regimens for LN are limited to patients of Asian ethnicity and hampered by significant heterogeneity. The positive results on clinical efficacy of TAC as induction treatment in LN cannot be extrapolated beyond Asian patients with LN. Therefore, further confirmation in multiethnic, randomised trials is mandatory. Until then, TAC can be considered in selected patients with LN.
当前指南未提及将他克莫司(TAC)作为一种治疗选择,且关于TAC在狼疮性肾炎(LN)中的作用尚无共识报道。本研究旨在指导LN患者使用TAC的临床判断。基于治疗目标(诱导或维持)、联合免疫抑制及数据质量,对研究LN中TAC治疗方案的临床研究进行了荟萃分析。共识别出23项针对LN患者开展的临床研究:6项病例系列研究、9项队列研究、2项病例对照研究以及6项随机对照试验(RCT)。在这6项RCT中,5项研究TAC方案作为诱导治疗,1项研究TAC方案作为维持治疗。5项RCT研究了TAC联合糖皮质激素,2项研究了TAC联合霉酚酸酯加糖皮质激素。所有RCT均在亚洲种族患者中进行。在荟萃分析中,TAC方案的总缓解率显著更高(相对风险(RR)1.23,95%置信区间1.12至1.34,p<0.05),完全缓解率也显著更高(RR 1.48,95%置信区间1.23至1.77,p<0.05)。阳性结果主要由最大的一项研究TAC联合霉酚酸酯加糖皮质激素的RCT所界定。在安全性方面,白细胞减少症的发生率显著更低,而肌酐升高的发生率更高。关于LN的TAC方案的临床研究仅限于亚洲种族患者,且受到显著异质性的阻碍。TAC作为LN诱导治疗的临床疗效的阳性结果不能外推至LN的非亚洲患者。因此,必须在多民族随机试验中进行进一步验证。在此之前,可在选定的LN患者中考虑使用TAC。