Massey Conner J, Bury Sean, Diamond Jay, Singh Ameet
Division of Otolaryngology, George Washington University Medical Center, Washington, D.C., USA.
Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2016 Nov 1;30(6):443-447. doi: 10.2500/ajra.2016.30.4358.
Extended endoscopic frontal sinusotomy is often required for surgical management of anterior skull base pathology. Such approaches are necessary for access to pathology and maintenance of postoperative frontal sinus outflow tract drainage. Cold steel instrumentation and endoscopic high-speed microdrills are typically used for bony removal during extended frontal sinus approaches but are associated with certain drawbacks, such as thermal injury and obscuration of the surgical field with bone dust.
We investigated the ultrasonic bone aspirator (UBA) as an adjunctive tool for extended endoscopic frontal sinusotomy in the setting of skull base surgery.
Medical records of patients who underwent either Draf IIB or Draf III sinusotomies from 2011 to 2014 were reviewed. The patients were split into two cohorts based on instrumentation: those who received sinusotomy primarily with the UBA, and those who had sinusotomy performed with conventional instrumentation only. The patients were followed up after surgery with routine endoscopic examinations and imaging when indicated. Patient demographics, surgical approach, operative complications, and postoperative outcomes were evaluated.
A total of 18 patients underwent endoscopic extended frontal sinusotomy for a variety of skull base pathologies with the UBA and the conventional instrumentation cohorts, which contained nine patients each. Five of the nine patients in the UBA cohort received Draf III sinusotomies compared with three of nine in the conventional cohort. Three patients in the UBA cohort experienced postoperative transient pressure hyperemia of the lip; this was seen in a single patient in the conventional cohort. All patients with postoperative endoscopic examinations maintained frontal sinus ostial patency to varying degrees, irrespective of cohort. Lund-Mackay scores and the need for operative revision of the frontal sinus were similar for both groups and seemed to be related to the use of postoperative radiation.
The UBA was a safe, effective tool for extended endoscopic frontal sinusotomy in endoscopic skull base surgery.
对于前颅底病变的手术治疗,通常需要进行扩大的内镜额窦切开术。此类手术入路对于接触病变以及维持术后额窦流出道引流是必要的。在扩大的额窦手术入路中,通常使用冷器械和内镜高速微型钻进行骨质切除,但它们存在某些缺点,如热损伤以及骨屑导致手术视野模糊。
我们研究了超声骨刀(UBA)作为扩大的内镜额窦切开术辅助工具在颅底手术中的应用。
回顾了2011年至2014年接受Draf IIB或Draf III鼻窦切开术患者的病历。根据手术器械将患者分为两组:主要使用UBA进行鼻窦切开术的患者,以及仅使用传统器械进行鼻窦切开术的患者。术后根据需要进行常规内镜检查和影像学检查对患者进行随访。评估患者的人口统计学资料、手术入路、手术并发症和术后结果。
共有18例患者分别使用UBA和传统器械进行了内镜扩大额窦切开术,治疗各种颅底病变,每组各9例。UBA组9例患者中有5例行Draf III鼻窦切开术,而传统组9例中有3例。UBA组有3例患者术后出现唇部短暂压力性充血;传统组仅1例出现此情况。所有接受术后内镜检查的患者无论在哪一组,均不同程度地维持了额窦开口通畅。两组的Lund-Mackay评分以及额窦手术修正的必要性相似,且似乎与术后放疗的使用有关。
在鼻内镜颅底手术中,UBA是扩大的内镜额窦切开术的一种安全、有效的工具。