Sundararajan Krishnaswamy, Schoeman Tom, Hughes Lara, Edwards Suzanne, Reddi Benjamin
Intensive Care Unit, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Discipline of Acute Care Medicine, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Emerg Med Australas. 2017 Apr;29(2):184-191. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.12737. Epub 2017 Jan 26.
To provide a current review of the clinical characteristics, predictors and outcomes in critically ill patients presenting to the ED with acute pancreatitis and subsequently admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU) of a tertiary referral centre in Australia.
A retrospective single-centre study of adult patients admitted with pancreatitis. Severe acute pancreatitis defined by Bedside Index of Severity in Acute Pancreatitis (BISAP) score ≥2.
Eighty-seven patients fulfilled criteria for inclusion during the study period, representing 0.9% of all ICU admissions. The median age of patients was 54. Survival was independent of patients' age, sex, aetiology and comorbidities. Mortality was 30.8% for both inpatient referrals to the ICU and for direct referrals via the ED. Higher mortality was identified among patients requiring mechanical ventilation (74.2 vs 24.6% in survivors; P < 0.0001), vasopressor support (85.7 vs 33.8% in survivors; P < 0.0001) or renal replacement therapy (60 vs 16.9% in survivors; P < 0.002). BISAP score surpasses Ranson's and Acute Physiological and Chronic Health Examination (APACHE) II scores in discriminating between survivors and non-survivors among unselected patients with acute pancreatitis admitted to ICU, whereas APACHE II discriminates better in the cohort admitted from ED.
Severe acute pancreatitis is associated with high mortality. Aetiology and comorbidity did not predict adverse outcomes in this population. BISAP score is non-inferior to APACHE II score as a prognostic tool in critically ill patients with acute pancreatitis and could be used to triage admission. Evidence of persistent organ dysfunction and requirements for organ support reliably identify patients at high-risk of death.
对澳大利亚一家三级转诊中心急诊科收治的急性胰腺炎危重症患者,随后入住重症监护病房(ICU)的临床特征、预测因素和预后进行最新综述。
对收治的胰腺炎成年患者进行单中心回顾性研究。采用急性胰腺炎床边严重程度指数(BISAP)评分≥2定义为重症急性胰腺炎。
在研究期间,87例患者符合纳入标准,占所有ICU入院患者的0.9%。患者的中位年龄为54岁。生存率与患者的年龄、性别、病因和合并症无关。ICU住院转诊患者和通过急诊科直接转诊患者的死亡率均为30.8%。需要机械通气的患者死亡率更高(幸存者中为74.2%,而非幸存者中为24.6%;P<0.0001),需要血管活性药物支持的患者死亡率更高(幸存者中为85.7%,而非幸存者中为33.8%;P<0.0001),或需要肾脏替代治疗的患者死亡率更高(幸存者中为60%,而非幸存者中为16.9%;P<0.002)。在未选择的入住ICU的急性胰腺炎患者中,BISAP评分在区分幸存者和非幸存者方面优于兰森标准和急性生理与慢性健康状况评估(APACHE)II评分,而APACHE II评分在从急诊科收治的队列中区分效果更好。
重症急性胰腺炎与高死亡率相关。病因和合并症不能预测该人群的不良预后。在急性胰腺炎危重症患者中,BISAP评分作为一种预后工具不劣于APACHE II评分,可用于分诊入院。持续器官功能障碍的证据和器官支持需求可可靠地识别死亡高危患者。