Suppr超能文献

BISAP评分与兰森评分在判定急性胰腺炎严重程度中的比较

Comparison of BISAP Score with Ranson's Score in Determining the Severity of Acute Pancreatitis.

作者信息

Shabbir Sidra, Jamal Shabana, Khaliq Tanwir, Khan Zainab Mahsal

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences, Islamabad.

出版信息

J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2015 May;25(5):328-31.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the accuracy of BISAP score in finding out the frequency of severity and mortality in patients with acute pancreatitis by comparing it with Ranson's score.

STUDY DESIGN

Crosse-sectional study.

PLACE AND DURATION OF STUDY

Department of Surgery, Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences, Islamabad, from April to December 2010.

METHODOLOGY

Atotal of 80 patients who presented in emergency with acute pancreatitis were included by consecutive non probability sampling technique. Cases of acute pancreatitis were classified as mild or severe based on the organ failure criteria and/or local complications according to the Atlanta Symposium. All patients were scored according to both Ranson's score and BISAP score.

RESULTS

Out of 80 patients, 35 (44%) were males and 45 (56%) were females. The mean age was 46.89 ± 15.75 years. Twenty five patients (31.25%) were classified as severe acute pancreatitis and 3 patients (3.75%) had evidence of pancreatic necrosis on CT scan. The duration of hospital stay was 1 - 54 days with a mean of 13.12 ± 12.83 days and mortality rate was 5%. The number of patients with a BISAP score of ≥ 3 was 15 and Ranson's score ≥ 3 was 25. The observed incidence of severe disease stratified by the BISAP score has (p < 0.001) and by Ranson's score has (p < 0.001). In regards to mortality, patients having BISAP score ≥ 3 has p=0.003, while patients having Ranson's score ≥ 3 has p=0.002, both are statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

The newly proposed BISAP score is a simple and accurate tool for severity stratification and is equally effective in finding out frequency of severity and in turns mortality in patients with acute pancreatitis as Ranson's score.

摘要

目的

通过将BISAP评分与兰森评分进行比较,确定其在急性胰腺炎患者中评估严重程度和死亡率频率的准确性。

研究设计

横断面研究。

研究地点和时间

2010年4月至12月,伊斯兰堡巴基斯坦医学科学研究所外科。

方法

采用连续非概率抽样技术纳入80例急诊急性胰腺炎患者。根据亚特兰大研讨会的器官衰竭标准和/或局部并发症,将急性胰腺炎病例分为轻度或重度。所有患者均根据兰森评分和BISAP评分进行评分。

结果

80例患者中,男性35例(44%),女性45例(56%)。平均年龄为46.89±15.75岁。25例患者(31.25%)被分类为重症急性胰腺炎,3例患者(3.75%)CT扫描显示有胰腺坏死。住院时间为1 - 54天,平均为13.12±12.83天,死亡率为5%。BISAP评分≥3分的患者有15例,兰森评分≥3分的患者有25例。根据BISAP评分分层的严重疾病观察发病率(p<0.001),根据兰森评分分层的严重疾病观察发病率(p<0.001)。在死亡率方面,BISAP评分≥3分的患者p=0.003,而兰森评分≥3分的患者p=0.002,两者均具有统计学意义。

结论

新提出的BISAP评分是一种简单准确的严重程度分层工具,在评估急性胰腺炎患者的严重程度频率及进而评估死亡率方面与兰森评分同样有效。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验