Suppr超能文献

支持和反对对高危患者进行皮质类固醇预防的证据。

The Evidence for and Against Corticosteroid Prophylaxis in At-Risk Patients.

作者信息

Davenport Matthew S, Cohan Richard H

机构信息

Department of Radiology and Urology, Michigan Radiology Quality Collaborative, University of Michigan Health System, 1500 East Medical Center Drive, B2-A209P, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.

Department of Radiology, University of Michigan Health System, 1500 East Medical Center Drive, B2-A209P, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.

出版信息

Radiol Clin North Am. 2017 Mar;55(2):413-421. doi: 10.1016/j.rcl.2016.10.012.

Abstract

Corticosteroid prophylaxis is commonly used for the prevention of allergiclike reactions to iodinated and gadolinium-based contrast material in patients at highest risk of an allergiclike reaction. However, it has only a weak mitigating effect on allergiclike reactions, probably does not affect the severity of subsequent reactions, and does not prevent all reactions. Breakthrough reactions occur, are usually the same severity as the index reaction, and can occasionally be life threatening. Premedication of inpatients is likely associated with substantial cost and harm because of hospital length-of-stay prolongation; these indirect effects may exceed the benefits of premedication in this population.

摘要

皮质类固醇预防措施通常用于预防对碘化造影剂和钆基造影剂发生类过敏反应风险最高的患者出现类过敏反应。然而,它对类过敏反应的缓解作用微弱,可能不会影响后续反应的严重程度,也不能预防所有反应。突破性反应会发生,其严重程度通常与初次反应相同,偶尔可能危及生命。住院患者的预处理可能会因住院时间延长而带来高昂成本和危害;在这一人群中,这些间接影响可能超过预处理的益处。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验