Viebahn Malte C, Ernestus Mirjam, McQueen James M
1 Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
2 Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
J Cogn Neurosci. 2017 Jul;29(7):1132-1146. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01095. Epub 2017 Jan 27.
This electrophysiological study asked whether the brain processes grammatical gender violations in casual speech differently than in careful speech. Native speakers of Dutch were presented with utterances that contained adjective-noun pairs in which the adjective was either correctly inflected with a word-final schwa (e.g., een spannende roman, "a suspenseful novel") or incorrectly uninflected without that schwa ( een spannend roman). Consistent with previous findings, the uninflected adjectives elicited an electrical brain response sensitive to syntactic violations when the talker was speaking in a careful manner. When the talker was speaking in a casual manner, this response was absent. A control condition showed electrophysiological responses for carefully as well as casually produced utterances with semantic anomalies, showing that listeners were able to understand the content of both types of utterance. The results suggest that listeners take information about the speaking style of a talker into account when processing the acoustic-phonetic information provided by the speech signal. Absent schwas in casual speech are effectively not grammatical gender violations. These changes in syntactic processing are evidence of contextually driven neural flexibility.
这项电生理研究探讨了大脑处理随意言语中语法性属违规情况的方式是否与严谨言语中的不同。研究人员让以荷兰语为母语的人听一些包含形容词 - 名词对的话语,其中形容词要么正确地在词尾带有弱读音节进行屈折变化(例如,een spannende roman,意为“一本悬疑小说”),要么错误地没有该弱读音节而未进行屈折变化(een spannend roman)。与先前的研究结果一致,当说话者以严谨的方式讲话时,未屈折变化的形容词会引发对句法违规敏感的脑电反应。当说话者以随意的方式讲话时,这种反应则不存在。一个对照条件显示,对于严谨和随意说出的带有语义异常的话语都有脑电反应,这表明听众能够理解这两种类型话语的内容。结果表明,听众在处理语音信号提供的声学 - 语音信息时会考虑说话者的说话风格信息。随意言语中缺失的弱读音节实际上并非语法性属违规。句法处理中的这些变化是上下文驱动的神经灵活性的证据。