Suppr超能文献

自然科学与社会科学的跨学科合作——以地下水研究为例的现状与趋势

Interdisciplinary Collaboration between Natural and Social Sciences - Status and Trends Exemplified in Groundwater Research.

作者信息

Barthel Roland, Seidl Roman

机构信息

Department of Earth Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.

D-USYS Transdisciplinarity Lab, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2017 Jan 27;12(1):e0170754. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170754. eCollection 2017.

Abstract

Interdisciplinary collaboration, particularly between natural and social sciences, is perceived as crucial to solving the significant challenges facing humanity. However, despite the need for such collaboration being expressed more frequently and intensely, it remains unclear to what degree such collaboration actually takes place, what trends and developments there are and which actors are involved. Previous studies, often based on bibliometric analysis of large bodies of literature, partly observed an increase in interdisciplinary collaboration in general, but in particular, the collaboration among distant fields was less explored. Other more qualitative studies found that interdisciplinary collaboration, particularly between natural and social scientists was not well developed, and obstacles abounded. To shed some light on the actual status and developments of this collaboration, we performed an analysis based on a sample of articles on groundwater research. We first identified journals and articles therein that potentially combined natural and social science aspects of groundwater research. Next, we analysed the disciplinary composition of their authors' teams, cited references, titles and keywords, making use of our detailed personal expertise in groundwater research and its interdisciplinary aspects. We combined several indicators developed from this analysis into a final classification of the degree of multidisciplinarity of each article. Covering the period between 1990 and 2014, we found that the overall percentage of multidisciplinary articles was in the low single-digit range, with only slight increases over the past decades. The interdisciplinarity of individuals plays a major role compared to interdisciplinarity involving two or more researchers. If collaboration with natural sciences takes place, social science is represented most often by economists. As a side result, we found that journals publishing multidisciplinary research had lower impact factors on average, and multidisciplinary papers were cited much less than mono-disciplinary ones.

摘要

跨学科合作,尤其是自然科学与社会科学之间的合作,被视为解决人类面临的重大挑战的关键。然而,尽管对这种合作的需求越来越频繁和强烈地表达出来,但这种合作实际发生的程度、有哪些趋势和发展以及涉及哪些行为主体仍不清楚。以前的研究,通常基于对大量文献的文献计量分析,部分观察到跨学科合作总体上有所增加,但特别是远距离领域之间的合作较少被探讨。其他更具定性的研究发现,跨学科合作,尤其是自然科学家与社会科学家之间的合作发展不佳,障碍众多。为了阐明这种合作关系的实际状况和发展情况,我们基于一组关于地下水研究的文章样本进行了分析。我们首先确定了可能结合了地下水研究的自然科学和社会科学方面的期刊及其中的文章。接下来,我们利用我们在地下水研究及其跨学科方面的详细个人专业知识,分析了其作者团队的学科构成、引用文献、标题和关键词。我们将从该分析中得出的几个指标组合成每篇文章多学科程度的最终分类。涵盖1990年至2014年期间,我们发现多学科文章的总体百分比处于个位数的低位,在过去几十年中仅有轻微增加。与涉及两名或更多研究人员的跨学科性相比,个人的跨学科性发挥着主要作用。如果与自然科学进行合作,社会科学方面最常由经济学家代表。作为一个附带结果,我们发现发表多学科研究的期刊平均影响因子较低,多学科论文的被引次数远少于单学科论文。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/00d5/5271333/13834bb15ea2/pone.0170754.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验