Suppr超能文献

社会焦虑障碍中社会威胁的神经反应以及认知行为疗法和接纳与承诺疗法的预测指标。

Neural responses to social threat and predictors of cognitive behavioral therapy and acceptance and commitment therapy in social anxiety disorder.

机构信息

University of California Los Angeles, Department of Psychology, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1563, United States.

University of California Los Angeles, Department of Psychology, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1563, United States.

出版信息

Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging. 2017 Mar 30;261:52-64. doi: 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2016.12.012. Epub 2016 Dec 28.

Abstract

Previous research has often highlighted hyperactivity in emotion regions to simple, static social threat cues in social anxiety disorder (SAD). Investigation of the neurobiology of SAD using more naturalistic paradigms can further reveal underlying mechanisms and how these relate to clinical outcomes. We used fMRI to investigate responses to novel dynamic rejection stimuli in individuals with SAD (N=70) and healthy controls (HC; N=17), and whether these responses predicted treatment outcomes following cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) or acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT). Both HC and SAD groups reported greater distress to rejection compared to neutral social stimuli. At the neural level, HCs exhibited greater activations in social pain/rejection regions, including dorsal anterior cingulate cortex and anterior insula, to rejection stimuli. The SAD group evidenced a different pattern, with no differences in these rejection regions and relatively greater activations in the amygdala and other regions to neutral stimuli. Greater responses in anterior cingulate cortex and the amygdala to rejection vs. neutral stimuli predicted better CBT outcomes. In contrast, enhanced activity in sensory-focused posterior insula predicted ACT responses.

摘要

先前的研究常常强调社交焦虑症(SAD)患者对简单、静态的社交威胁线索的情绪区域过度活跃。使用更自然的范式研究 SAD 的神经生物学可以进一步揭示潜在的机制以及这些机制与临床结果的关系。我们使用 fMRI 研究了 SAD 患者(N=70)和健康对照组(HC;N=17)对新颖动态拒绝刺激的反应,以及这些反应是否可以预测认知行为治疗(CBT)或接受和承诺治疗(ACT)后的治疗效果。HC 和 SAD 组报告说,与中性社会刺激相比,他们对拒绝的痛苦更大。在神经水平上,与中性刺激相比,HC 组在社会痛苦/拒绝区域(包括背侧前扣带皮层和前岛叶)表现出更大的激活。SAD 组表现出不同的模式,拒绝区域没有差异,对中性刺激的杏仁核和其他区域的激活相对较大。与中性刺激相比,前扣带皮层和杏仁核对拒绝刺激的反应越大,CBT 效果越好。相比之下,感觉聚焦后岛叶的活动增强预测了 ACT 的反应。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0895/5435374/3a8587a5aee2/nihms846853f1.jpg

相似文献

引用本文的文献

7
Neurocircuitry of treatment in anxiety disorders.焦虑症的治疗神经回路
Biomark Neuropsychiatry. 2022 Jun;6. doi: 10.1016/j.bionps.2022.100052. Epub 2022 Apr 22.

本文引用的文献

2
A meta-analysis of the anterior cingulate contribution to social pain.前扣带回对社交疼痛影响的荟萃分析。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2015 Jan;10(1):19-27. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsu110. Epub 2014 Aug 19.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验