J Am Dent Assoc. 2017 Feb;148(2):100-105. doi: 10.1016/j.adaj.2016.11.014.
Vertical root fracture (VRF) requires root removal. Diagnostics for proper identification are critical. The author conducted a study to relate subjective, objective, and radiographic findings for VRF identification. They noted visual changes of root and overlying bone patterns after flap reflection.
The author examined a case series of roots with suspected VRF after flap reflection and root or root-end removal; 42 roots were identified with a fracture. Before reflection, the author obtained diagnostic and periapical radiographic data that included symptoms, soft-tissue changes, percussion, mobility, probing patterns, and radiographic findings. After flap reflection, the author evaluated bony changes and root surfaces. VRF was visually confirmed after tooth or root removal.
Signs and symptoms diagnostic of VRF were inconsistent. All patients had endodontic therapy, many with posts, and for all patients, the pain was none to mild. In addition, the author found a history or presence of swelling (77%) or sinus tract (31%), that probing patterns differed (narrow-rectangular 66%), and that there was no defect in some patients (21%). Radiographic patterns varied from no change to extensive bone loss, and mobility ranged from none (55%) to slight or moderate (45%). Flap reflection revealed a "punched-out" bony lesion with granulomatous tissue (100%), and patterns were fenestration (21%) or dehiscence (79%). A fracture was visible on roots or resected root ends.
The author found no consistent signs, symptoms, or radiographic changes of VRF. Flap reflection was found to be predictably useful; fractured roots had bony defects filled with granulomatous tissue.
VRF may be suspected from clinical findings; however, flap reflection is usually required for identification. Characteristic bony pattern and root visualization reveals the fracture, although root-end resection and examination is occasionally required.
垂直根折(VRF)需要去除牙根。正确识别的诊断至关重要。作者进行了一项研究,旨在探讨 VRF 识别的主观、客观和放射学发现之间的关系。他们注意到瓣状瓣翻瓣后根和覆盖骨的形态发生了肉眼可见的变化。
作者检查了瓣状瓣翻瓣后疑似 VRF 的根系列病例,以及去除牙根或根尖的病例;共发现 42 个根有骨折。在瓣状瓣翻瓣之前,作者获得了包括症状、软组织变化、叩诊、松动度、探查模式和放射学发现在内的诊断和根尖放射学数据。瓣状瓣翻瓣后,作者评估了骨变化和根面。在牙齿或牙根去除后,肉眼确认 VRF。
提示 VRF 的症状和体征不一致。所有患者均行根管治疗,许多患者有桩,所有患者疼痛为轻度或无。此外,作者发现 77%的患者有肿胀或窦道史或存在,探查模式不同(66%为窄矩形),21%的患者没有缺损。放射学模式从无变化到广泛骨丢失不等,松动度从无(55%)到轻度或中度(45%)不等。瓣状瓣翻瓣后显示出“穿孔样”骨病变伴肉芽组织(100%),病变呈窗孔样(21%)或裂隙样(79%)。在牙根或切除的根尖上可见骨折。
作者发现 VRF 没有一致的症状、体征或放射学变化。瓣状瓣翻瓣被发现是非常有用的;有骨折的牙根有肉芽组织填充的骨缺损。
临床发现可能怀疑 VRF;然而,通常需要瓣状瓣翻瓣来识别。特征性的骨形态和根的可视化揭示了骨折,尽管偶尔需要进行根尖切除和检查。