Elhaddaoui Rajae, Qoraich Halima Saadia, Bahije Loubna, Zaoui Fatima
Service d'orthopédie dento-faciale, faculté de médecine dentaire, Mohammed V University, avenue Allal el Fassi, rue Mohammed Jazouli, cité Al Irfane, BP 6212, Rabat, Morocco.
Service d'orthopédie dento-faciale, faculté de médecine dentaire, Mohammed V University, avenue Allal el Fassi, rue Mohammed Jazouli, cité Al Irfane, BP 6212, Rabat, Morocco.
Int Orthod. 2017 Mar;15(1):1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.ortho.2016.12.019. Epub 2017 Jan 26.
Root resorption is one of the leading problems in orthodontic treatment. Most earlier studies have assessed the incidence and severity of root resorption following orthodontic treatment using fixed appliances as well as associated factors. However, few studies have assessed these parameters in the context of orthodontic treatment using thermoplastic splints or aligners. The aim of this systematic review was to assess the incidence and severity of root resorption following orthodontic treatment using aligners and associated factors. A comparative analysis was also made with fixed multi-bracket treatments.
The data bases consulted were: Medline, Embase, EBSCO Host, Cochrane Library and Science Direct. Our search included meta-analyses, randomized and non-randomized controled trials, cohort studies and descriptive studies published before December 2015 and evidencing a connection with the incidence and severity of root resorption following orthodontic treatment using aligners alone or compared with fixed multi-bracket treatments.
Among the 93 selected references, only 3 studies met our selection criteria. The incidence of root resorption ranged between 0 and 46%, of which 6% were severe cases. Relative to fixed multi-bracket non-extraction treatments to correct the same malocclusions, the incidence of resorption ranged between 2% and 50%, of which 22% were severe cases. In both techniques, the incidence of resorption was higher for the maxillary incisors and was not influenced by either age or sex.
In malocclusion cases not requiring extractions, orthodontic aligner treatment is possibly associated with a lower incidence of resorption than fixed multi-bracket treatment. Further research encompassing extraction cases is needed to better assess the incidence and severity of root resorption following the use of these removable appliances.
牙根吸收是正畸治疗中的主要问题之一。大多数早期研究评估了使用固定矫治器进行正畸治疗后牙根吸收的发生率和严重程度以及相关因素。然而,很少有研究在使用热塑性夹板或矫治器进行正畸治疗的背景下评估这些参数。本系统评价的目的是评估使用矫治器进行正畸治疗后牙根吸收的发生率和严重程度以及相关因素。还与固定多托槽治疗进行了对比分析。
查阅的数据库有:Medline、Embase、EBSCO Host、Cochrane图书馆和Science Direct。我们的检索包括2015年12月之前发表的荟萃分析、随机和非随机对照试验、队列研究和描述性研究,这些研究证明了与单独使用矫治器或与固定多托槽治疗相比进行正畸治疗后牙根吸收的发生率和严重程度之间的联系。
在93篇选定的参考文献中,只有3项研究符合我们的选择标准。牙根吸收的发生率在0%至46%之间,其中6%为严重病例。相对于用于矫正相同错牙合畸形的固定多托槽非拔牙治疗,吸收的发生率在2%至50%之间,其中22%为严重病例。在这两种技术中,上颌切牙的吸收发生率较高,且不受年龄或性别的影响。
在不需要拔牙的错牙合畸形病例中,正畸矫治器治疗可能比固定多托槽治疗的吸收发生率更低。需要进一步开展涵盖拔牙病例的研究,以更好地评估使用这些可摘矫治器后牙根吸收的发生率和严重程度。