Shippee Nathan D, Shippee Tetyana P, Mobley Patrick D, Fernstrom Karl M, Britt Heather R
1 Division of Health Policy and Management, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
2 Division of Applied Research, Allina Health, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2018 Jan;35(1):104-109. doi: 10.1177/1049909117690710. Epub 2017 Jan 29.
Patients with serious chronic illness are at a greater risk of depersonalized, overmedicalized care as they move into later life. Existing intervention research on person-focused care for persons in this transitional period is limited.
To test the effects of LifeCourse, a team-based, whole-person intervention emphasizing listening to and knowing patients, on patient experience at 6 months.
This is a quasi-experimental study with patients allocated to LifeCourse and comparison groups based on 2 geographic locations. Robust change-score regression models adjusted for baseline differences and confounding.
SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: Patients (113 intervention, 99 comparison in analyses) were individuals with heart failure or other serious chronic illness, cancer, or dementia who had visits to hospitals at a large multipractice health system in the United States Midwest.
Primary outcome was 6-month change in patient experience measured via a novel, validated 21-item patient experience tool developed specifically for this intervention. Covariates included demographics, comorbidity score, and primary diagnosis.
At 6 months, LifeCourse was associated with a moderate improvement in overall patient experience versus usual care. Individual domain subscales for care team, communication, and patient goals were not individually significant but trended positively in the direction of effect.
Person-focused, team-based interventions can improve patient experience with care at a stage fraught with overmedicalization and many care needs. Improvement in patient experience in LifeCourse represents the sum effect of small improvements across different domains/aspects of care such as relationships with and work by the care team.
患有严重慢性病的患者在步入晚年时,面临接受非个性化、过度医疗护理的风险更高。针对处于这一过渡阶段人群的以患者为中心的护理的现有干预研究有限。
测试LifeCourse(一种强调倾听和了解患者的基于团队的全人干预措施)在6个月时对患者体验的影响。
这是一项准实验研究,根据两个地理位置将患者分配到LifeCourse组和对照组。采用稳健的变化分数回归模型对基线差异和混杂因素进行调整。
设置/参与者:患者(分析中113名干预组,99名对照组)为患有心力衰竭或其他严重慢性病、癌症或痴呆症的个体,他们在美国中西部一个大型多机构医疗系统的医院就诊。
主要结局是通过专门为此干预措施开发的一种新颖、经过验证的21项患者体验工具测量的6个月时患者体验的变化。协变量包括人口统计学、合并症评分和主要诊断。
在6个月时,与常规护理相比,LifeCourse与患者总体体验的适度改善相关。护理团队、沟通和患者目标的各个领域子量表虽无个体显著差异,但在效应方向上呈正向趋势。
以患者为中心的基于团队的干预措施可以在一个充满过度医疗化和诸多护理需求的阶段改善患者的护理体验。LifeCourse中患者体验的改善代表了护理不同领域/方面(如与护理团队的关系和护理团队的工作)的小改善的综合效应。