Strand Vibeke, Girolomoni Giampiero, Schiestl Martin, Ernst Mayer Robert, Friccius-Quecke Hilke, McCamish Mark
a Division of Immunology/Rheumatology , Stanford University School of Medicine , Palo Alto , California , USA.
b Dermatology and Venereology Section , University of Verona School of Medicine , Verona , Italy.
Curr Med Res Opin. 2017 Jun;33(6):993-1003. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2017.1288612. Epub 2017 Feb 7.
The aim of this review is to describe the inherent variability that is natural to biologics and, using the proposed etanercept biosimilar (GP2015) as an example, provide details on the "totality-of-the-evidence" concept, whereby all physicochemical, biologic, preclinical, and clinical data for a biosimilar and reference medicine are evaluated in an iterative, stepwise manner and shown to be highly similar.
This review was carried out by a search of published articles, reviews, abstracts and patents in PubMed/Medline and Google Scholar up to November 2016.
Analytical, functional, preclinical, and clinical data provide a comprehensive understanding of both GP2015 and reference etanercept, and demonstrate a high level of similarity between the two products in accordance with regulatory requirements. The totality of the evidence from all analyses and performed trials provides a robust scientific bridge between the biosimilar and clinical experience with the reference medicine, and is used to justify the use of the biosimilar in all indications for which the reference medicine is approved.
Biologic therapies have revolutionized the treatment of immune-mediated inflammatory diseases. The availability of biosimilars has the potential to improve patient access to biologic medicines and stimulate innovation. Physicians may be unfamiliar with the totality-of-the-evidence concept; therefore education and information on this unique approach to developing biosimilars is required to facilitate the use of biosimilars in clinical practice and allow physicians to make informed treatment decisions.
本综述的目的是描述生物制剂固有的变异性,并以拟议的依那西普生物类似药(GP2015)为例,详细介绍“证据总体”概念,即对生物类似药和参比药品的所有物理化学、生物学、临床前和临床数据进行迭代、逐步评估,并证明它们高度相似。
本综述通过检索截至2016年11月在PubMed/Medline和谷歌学术上发表的文章、综述、摘要和专利来进行。
分析、功能、临床前和临床数据提供了对GP2015和参比依那西普的全面理解,并根据监管要求证明了这两种产品之间的高度相似性。所有分析和进行的试验的证据总体在生物类似药和参比药品的临床经验之间架起了一座坚实的科学桥梁,并用于证明在参比药品获批的所有适应症中使用该生物类似药的合理性。
生物疗法彻底改变了免疫介导的炎症性疾病的治疗方式。生物类似药的可及性有可能改善患者获得生物药物的机会并刺激创新。医生可能不熟悉证据总体概念;因此,需要关于这种开发生物类似药的独特方法的教育和信息,以促进生物类似药在临床实践中的使用,并使医生能够做出明智的治疗决策。