• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用单独的纳替克斯或与Bio-Oss和胶原膜联合使用对种植体周围炎缺损进行两种再生性外科治疗的比较。

Comparison of Two Regenerative Surgical Treatments for Peri-Implantitis Defect using Natix Alone or in Combination with Bio-Oss and Collagen Membrane.

作者信息

Arab Hamidreza, Shiezadeh Farid, Moeintaghavi Amir, Anbiaei Najme, Mohamadi Satlikh

机构信息

Dental Research Center, Department of Periodontology, University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.

Department of Periodontics, North Khorasan University of Medical Sciences, Bojnurd, Iran.

出版信息

J Long Term Eff Med Implants. 2016;26(3):199-204. doi: 10.1615/JLongTermEffMedImplants.2016016396.

DOI:10.1615/JLongTermEffMedImplants.2016016396
PMID:28134601
Abstract

The aim of this clinical trial was to evaluate 6-month clinical and radiographic outcomes after surgical regenerative therapy of peri-implantitis lesions using either porous titanium granules (Natix, Tigran Technologies, Malmo, Sweden) alone or bovine bone mineral (Bio-Oss, Giestlich, Wolhusen, Switzerland) with a collagen membrane (B&B Dental Implant Company, San Pietro, Italy). Twenty-four patients having at least one implant with a peri-implantitis lesion were involved in this study. Patients were assigned randomly into two groups and treated with two different regenerative approaches. The first group (Group 1) received Natix alone and the second group (Group 2) received Bio-Oss plus collagen membrane after debridement of the defect. Probing depth, clinical attachment level, and radiographic measurements were recorded at baseline and after 6 months of healing. One patient with one implant from Group 1 and another patient with 2 implants from the Group 2 discontinued the study. Mean pocket depth change was 1.1 ± 1.4 mm in Group 1 and 1.1 ± 2.1 mm in Group 2. Bone level changes were 0.85 ± 1.06 and 1.4 ± 1.04 mm in the two groups, respectively, over the 6-month follow-up period. Neither clinical nor radiographical differences between the two groups were statistically significant. We conclude that both application of porous titanium granules and Bio-Oss plus collagen membrane resulted in clinical improvement of peri-implantitis lesions over a period of 6 months.

摘要

本临床试验的目的是评估使用多孔钛颗粒(瑞典马尔默Tigran Technologies公司的Natix)单独治疗或使用牛骨矿物质(瑞士沃尔胡森Giestlich公司的Bio-Oss)联合胶原膜(意大利圣彼得罗B&B Dental Implant Company公司)对种植体周围炎病变进行手术再生治疗后的6个月临床和影像学结果。本研究纳入了24例至少有1颗种植体存在种植体周围炎病变的患者。患者被随机分为两组,采用两种不同的再生方法进行治疗。第一组(第1组)仅接受Natix治疗,第二组(第2组)在清创后接受Bio-Oss联合胶原膜治疗。在基线和愈合6个月后记录探诊深度、临床附着水平和影像学测量结果。第1组有1例种植体的1名患者和第2组有2颗种植体的另1名患者退出了研究。第1组平均袋深变化为1.1±1.4mm,第2组为1.1±2.1mm。在6个月的随访期内,两组的骨水平变化分别为0.85±1.06mm和1.4±1.04mm。两组之间在临床和影像学上均无统计学显著差异。我们得出结论,多孔钛颗粒和Bio-Oss联合胶原膜的应用在6个月内均使种植体周围炎病变得到了临床改善。

相似文献

1
Comparison of Two Regenerative Surgical Treatments for Peri-Implantitis Defect using Natix Alone or in Combination with Bio-Oss and Collagen Membrane.使用单独的纳替克斯或与Bio-Oss和胶原膜联合使用对种植体周围炎缺损进行两种再生性外科治疗的比较。
J Long Term Eff Med Implants. 2016;26(3):199-204. doi: 10.1615/JLongTermEffMedImplants.2016016396.
2
Clinical and radiographic outcomes of a combined resective and regenerative approach in the treatment of peri-implantitis: a prospective case series.联合切除与再生方法治疗种植体周围炎的临床和影像学结果:一项前瞻性病例系列研究
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014 Jul;25(7):761-7. doi: 10.1111/clr.12183. Epub 2013 May 8.
3
Absorbable versus nonabsorbable membranes and bone grafts in the treatment of ligature-induced peri-implantitis defects in dogs: a histometric investigation.可吸收与不可吸收膜及骨移植材料治疗犬结扎诱导性种植体周围炎缺损的组织计量学研究
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2001 Sep-Oct;16(5):646-52.
4
Regenerative surgical therapy for peri-implantitis using deproteinized bovine bone mineral with 10% collagen, enamel matrix derivative and Doxycycline-A prospective 3-year cohort study.使用脱蛋白牛骨矿物质(含 10%胶原)、釉基质衍生物和强力霉素进行种植体周围炎的再生性外科治疗——一项前瞻性 3 年队列研究。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018 Jun;29(6):583-591. doi: 10.1111/clr.13256. Epub 2018 May 16.
5
Regenerative surgical treatment of peri-implantitis using either a collagen membrane or concentrated growth factor: A 12-month randomized clinical trial.采用胶原膜或浓缩生长因子的种植体周围炎再生性外科治疗:一项为期 12 个月的随机临床试验。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2018 Oct;20(5):703-712. doi: 10.1111/cid.12661. Epub 2018 Aug 17.
6
Anorganic porous bovine-derived bone mineral (Bio-Oss) and ePTFE membrane in the treatment of peri-implantitis in cynomolgus monkeys.无机多孔牛源骨矿物质(Bio-Oss)和ePTFE膜治疗食蟹猴种植体周围炎。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2003 Oct;14(5):535-47. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.00911.x.
7
Absorbable versus nonabsorbable membranes and bone grafts in the treatment of ligature-induced peri-implantitis defects in dogs. Part I. A clinical investigation.可吸收与不可吸收膜及骨移植材料治疗犬结扎诱导种植体周围炎缺损的研究。第一部分:临床研究。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2001 Apr;12(2):115-20. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.012002115.x.
8
Surgical therapy of peri-implantitis lesions by means of a bovine-derived xenograft: comparative results of a prospective study on two different implant surfaces.采用牛源性异种移植物对种植体周围炎病变进行手术治疗:两种不同种植体表面的前瞻性研究比较结果。
J Clin Periodontol. 2011 Aug;38(8):738-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2011.01742.x. Epub 2011 Jun 2.
9
Surgical treatment of peri-implantitis using a bone substitute with or without a resorbable membrane: a 5-year follow-up.使用或不使用可吸收膜的骨替代物治疗种植体周围炎:5年随访
J Clin Periodontol. 2014 Nov;41(11):1108-14. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12308. Epub 2014 Oct 17.
10
Successful management of peri-implantitis with a regenerative approach: a consecutive series of 51 treated implants with 3- to 7.5-year follow-up.采用再生方法成功治疗种植体周围炎:连续51颗接受治疗的种植体,随访3至7.5年。
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2012 Feb;32(1):11-20.

引用本文的文献

1
Regenerative Treatment of Peri-Implantitis: A Systematic Revie.种植体周围炎的再生治疗:一项系统综述。 (注:原文标题最后单词“Revie”拼写有误,推测可能是“Review”)
Front Dent. 2020 Dec 25;17:38. doi: 10.18502/fid.v17i38.5291. eCollection 2020.