Angelone-Alasaad Samer, Biebach Iris, Pérez Jesús M, Soriguer Ramón C, Granados José E
Institute of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies (IEU), University of Zürich, Winterthurerstrasse 190, Zürich, Switzerland.
Estación Biológica de Doñana, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), Avda. Américo Vespucio s/n Sevilla, Spain.
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 30;12(1):e0170827. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170827. eCollection 2017.
Genetic differentiation in historically connected populations could be the result of genetic drift or adaptation, two processes that imply a need for differing strategies in population management. The aim of our study was to use neutral genetic markers to characterize C. pyrenaica populations genetically and examine results in terms of (i) demographic history, (ii) subspecific classification and (iii) the implications for the management of Iberian ibex.
METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We used 30 neutral microsatellite markers from 333 Iberian ibex to explore genetic diversity in the three main Iberian ibex populations in Spain corresponding to the two persisting subspecies (victoria and hispanica). Our molecular analyses detected recent genetic bottlenecks in all the studied populations, a finding that coincides with the documented demographic decline in C. pyrenaica in recent decades. Genetic divergence between the two C. pyrenaica subspecies (hispanica and victoriae) was substantial (FST between 0.39 and 0.47). Unexpectedly, we found similarly high genetic differentiation between two populations (Sierra Nevada and Maestrazgo) belonging to the subspecies hispanica. The genetic pattern identified in our study could be the result of strong genetic drift due to the severe genetic bottlenecks in the studied populations, caused in turn by the progressive destruction of natural habitat, disease epidemics and/or uncontrolled hunting.
Previous Capra pyrenaica conservation decision-making was based on the clear distinction between the two subspecies (victoriae and hispanica); yet our paper raises questions about the usefulness for conservation plans of the distinction between these subspecies.
历史上有联系的种群中的遗传分化可能是遗传漂变或适应性的结果,这两个过程意味着在种群管理中需要不同的策略。我们研究的目的是使用中性遗传标记对比利牛斯山羊种群进行遗传特征分析,并从以下几个方面检验结果:(i)种群历史,(ii)亚种分类,以及(iii)对伊比利亚野山羊管理的影响。
方法/主要发现:我们使用来自333只伊比利亚野山羊的30个中性微卫星标记,探索了西班牙三个主要伊比利亚野山羊种群的遗传多样性,这三个种群对应于两个现存的亚种(维多利亚亚种和西班牙亚种)。我们的分子分析在所有研究种群中检测到近期的遗传瓶颈,这一发现与近几十年来比利牛斯山羊有记录的种群数量下降相吻合。比利牛斯山羊的两个亚种(西班牙亚种和维多利亚亚种)之间的遗传分化很大(FST在0.39至0.47之间)。出乎意料的是,我们在属于西班牙亚种的两个种群(内华达山脉种群和梅斯特雷戈种群)之间发现了同样高的遗传分化。我们研究中确定的遗传模式可能是由于研究种群中严重的遗传瓶颈导致的强烈遗传漂变的结果,而遗传瓶颈又是由自然栖息地的逐渐破坏、疾病流行和/或无节制的狩猎造成的。
以前比利牛斯山羊的保护决策是基于两个亚种(维多利亚亚种和西班牙亚种)之间的明确区分;然而我们的论文对这些亚种之间的区分在保护计划中的有用性提出了疑问。