Roberge James J, Mason Emanuel J
a Temple University and University of Kentucky , USA.
J Gen Psychol. 1978 Apr;98(2):187-195. doi: 10.1080/00221309.1978.9920872.
Sixty adolescents (30 boys and 30 girls) evaluated conclusions for deductive arguments embodying four principles of class reasoning and their logically equivalent isomorphs in conditional reasoning. The presence or absence of the negative "not" was varied systematically in the major premise of the arguments. The results indicated that (a) there was a lack of improvement during early adolescence in the ability to reason with both class and conditional reasoning arguments, (b) the difficulty of specific principles of inference varied according to both the type of reasoning and the location of negation in the major premise, and
60名青少年(30名男孩和30名女孩)对体现类别推理四条原则的演绎论证结论及其在条件推理中逻辑等价的同构形式进行了评估。论证的大前提中“非”的有无被系统地改变。结果表明:(a)在青春期早期,类别推理和条件推理论证的推理能力缺乏提高;(b)具体推理原则的难度因推理类型和大前提中否定词的位置而异,并且