Wright Cynthia J, Linens Shelley W, Cain M Spencer
Health Science Department, Whitworth University, Spokane, WA.
Department of Kinesiology and Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017 Sep;98(9):1806-1811. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.01.003. Epub 2017 Jan 27.
To establish the minimal detectable change (MDC) and minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT) in a population with chronic ankle instability (CAI).
Experimental cohort.
Laboratory.
A convenience sample of individuals with CAI (N=50; 12 men; 38 women; episodes of giving way, 5.84±12.54mo). CAI inclusion criteria included a history of an ankle sprain, recurrent episodes of giving way, and a CAIT score ≤25.
Participants completed demographic information, an injury history questionnaire, and the CAIT. Participants then either participated in 4 weeks of wobble board balance training, resistance tubing strength training, or no intervention. After 4 weeks, participants recompleted the CAIT and recorded their global rating of change (GRC).
Dependent variables were pre- and postintervention scores on the CAIT and postintervention GRC. The MDC with 95% confidence interval was calculated. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve identified the optimal CAIT cut point (MCID) between improved and unimproved individuals on the basis of their GRC. The area under the curve was used to identify a significant ROC curve (α=.05).
The average CAIT score preintervention was 16.8±5.6, and postintervention, it was 20.0±5.2. Thirty-one participants (62%) rated themselves as improved on the GRC scale, whereas 19 (38%) were not improved. The ROC curve was significant (area under the curve, .797; P=.001), indicating that the CAIT change score significantly predicted clinical status. The MDC was 3.08, and the MCID was ≥3 points.
The CAIT has an MDC and MCID of ≥3 points. When CAIT scores are used to assess patient change over time, these scores should be used as a minimum threshold to indicate detectable and clinically meaningful improvement.
确定慢性踝关节不稳(CAI)人群中坎伯兰踝关节不稳工具(CAIT)的最小可检测变化(MDC)和最小临床重要差异(MCID)。
实验队列研究。
实验室。
CAI患者的便利样本(N = 50;男性12名;女性38名;踝关节打软次数为5.84±12.54个月)。CAI纳入标准包括踝关节扭伤史、反复踝关节打软发作以及CAIT评分≤25分。
参与者完成人口统计学信息、损伤史问卷以及CAIT评估。然后,参与者要么参加为期4周的摇摆板平衡训练、弹力带抗阻训练,要么不接受干预。4周后,参与者再次完成CAIT评估并记录其整体变化评级(GRC)。
因变量为干预前后的CAIT评分以及干预后的GRC。计算95%置信区间的MDC。绘制受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线,根据GRC确定改善与未改善个体之间的最佳CAIT切点(MCID)。曲线下面积用于确定显著的ROC曲线(α = 0.05)。
干预前CAIT平均评分为16.8±5.6,干预后为20.0±5.2。31名参与者(62%)在GRC量表上自我评定为改善,而19名(38%)未改善。ROC曲线具有显著性(曲线下面积为0.797;P = 0.001),表明CAIT变化评分能显著预测临床状态。MDC为3.08,MCID为≥3分。
CAIT的MDC和MCID为≥3分。当使用CAIT评分评估患者随时间的变化时,这些评分应作为表明可检测到的且具有临床意义的改善的最低阈值。