Fletcher T B, Setiawan H, Harrell R S, Redman H C
Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas 75235.
Radiology. 1989 Dec;173(3):621-5. doi: 10.1148/radiology.173.3.2813764.
Stab wounds to the back present a diagnostic problem, since missed occult abdominal injuries can lead to serious morbidity. In a prospective study of 205 patients, the authors evaluated the usefulness of abdominal computed tomography (CT) in assessment of low-velocity penetrating injury to the back. CT results were classified into three groups. Category 1 included injuries limited to superficial subcutaneous tissue (n = 174); category 2, injuries to the retroperitoneal compartment (n = 18); and category 3, injuries within the peritoneal cavity (n = 13). Fifty patients underwent surgery, including 30 with category 1 injuries, nine with category 2 injuries, and eleven with category 3 injuries. CT categorization of injury, compared with surgical findings in these 50 patients, had a sensitivity of 85% and specificity of 93%. The CT interpretation was considered correct if it demonstrated peritoneal penetration or retroperitoneal injury potentially requiring surgery. The remaining 155 patients were managed nonoperatively, and none had late complications. Abdominal CT is a reliable diagnostic tool in the evaluation of penetrating injury to the back.
背部刺伤存在诊断难题,因为漏诊隐匿性腹部损伤可能导致严重的发病率。在一项对205例患者的前瞻性研究中,作者评估了腹部计算机断层扫描(CT)在评估背部低速穿透伤中的作用。CT结果分为三组。第1类包括仅限于浅表皮下组织的损伤(n = 174);第2类,腹膜后腔损伤(n = 18);第3类,腹腔内损伤(n = 13)。50例患者接受了手术,其中30例为第1类损伤,9例为第2类损伤,11例为第3类损伤。与这50例患者的手术结果相比,CT对损伤的分类敏感性为85%,特异性为93%。如果CT显示有腹膜穿透或可能需要手术的腹膜后损伤,则认为CT解释是正确的。其余155例患者接受非手术治疗,无一例出现晚期并发症。腹部CT是评估背部穿透伤的可靠诊断工具。