• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全科医生使用早期干预决策支持系统时的诊断准确性:一项高保真模拟研究。

Diagnostic accuracy of GPs when using an early-intervention decision support system: a high-fidelity simulation.

作者信息

Kostopoulou Olga, Porat Talya, Corrigan Derek, Mahmoud Samhar, Delaney Brendan C

机构信息

Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London.

Department of Primary Care and Public Health Sciences, King's College London, London.

出版信息

Br J Gen Pract. 2017 Mar;67(656):e201-e208. doi: 10.3399/bjgp16X688417. Epub 2017 Jan 30.

DOI:10.3399/bjgp16X688417
PMID:28137782
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5325662/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Observational and experimental studies of the diagnostic task have demonstrated the importance of the first hypotheses that come to mind for accurate diagnosis. A prototype decision support system (DSS) designed to support GPs' first impressions has been integrated with a commercial electronic health record (EHR) system.

AIM

To evaluate the prototype DSS in a high-fidelity simulation.

DESIGN AND SETTING

Within-participant design: 34 GPs consulted with six standardised patients (actors) using their usual EHR. On a different day, GPs used the EHR with the integrated DSS to consult with six other patients, matched for difficulty and counterbalanced.

METHOD

Entering the reason for encounter triggered the DSS, which provided a patient-specific list of potential diagnoses, and supported coding of symptoms during the consultation. At each consultation, GPs recorded their diagnosis and management. At the end, they completed a usability questionnaire. The actors completed a satisfaction questionnaire after each consultation.

RESULTS

There was an 8-9% absolute improvement in diagnostic accuracy when the DSS was used. This improvement was significant (odds ratio [OR] 1.41, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.13 to 1.77, <0.01). There was no associated increase of investigations ordered or consultation length. GPs coded significantly more data when using the DSS (mean 12.35 with the DSS versus 1.64 without), and were generally satisfied with its usability. Patient satisfaction ratings were the same for consultations with and without the DSS.

CONCLUSION

The DSS prototype was successfully employed in simulated consultations of high fidelity, with no measurable influences on patient satisfaction. The substantially increased data coding can operate as motivation for future DSS adoption.

摘要

背景

对诊断任务的观察性和实验性研究表明,最初想到的假设对于准确诊断至关重要。一个旨在支持全科医生第一印象的原型决策支持系统(DSS)已与商业电子健康记录(EHR)系统集成。

目的

在高保真模拟中评估该原型DSS。

设计与设置

参与者内设计:34名全科医生使用他们常用的EHR与6名标准化患者(演员)进行会诊。在不同的一天,全科医生使用集成了DSS的EHR与另外6名患者进行会诊,这些患者在难度上匹配且经过了平衡处理。

方法

输入会诊原因会触发DSS,它会提供一份针对患者的潜在诊断列表,并在会诊期间支持对症状进行编码。每次会诊时,全科医生记录他们的诊断和管理措施。最后,他们完成一份可用性问卷。演员在每次会诊后完成一份满意度问卷。

结果

使用DSS时,诊断准确性有8 - 9%的绝对提高。这种提高具有统计学意义(优势比[OR]为1.41,95%置信区间[CI] = 1.13至1.77,P<0.01)。所开具的检查或会诊时长没有相应增加。使用DSS时,全科医生编码的数据显著更多(使用DSS时平均为12.35,不使用时为1.64),并且总体上对其可用性感到满意。使用和不使用DSS的会诊中患者满意度评分相同。

结论

DSS原型在高保真模拟会诊中成功应用,对患者满意度没有可测量的影响。大幅增加的数据编码可成为未来采用DSS的动力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/40de/5325662/a33a3befeab6/bjgpMar-2017-67-656-e201-OA-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/40de/5325662/6f76fc8b9bab/bjgpMar-2017-67-656-e201-OA-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/40de/5325662/a33a3befeab6/bjgpMar-2017-67-656-e201-OA-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/40de/5325662/6f76fc8b9bab/bjgpMar-2017-67-656-e201-OA-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/40de/5325662/a33a3befeab6/bjgpMar-2017-67-656-e201-OA-2.jpg

相似文献

1
Diagnostic accuracy of GPs when using an early-intervention decision support system: a high-fidelity simulation.全科医生使用早期干预决策支持系统时的诊断准确性:一项高保真模拟研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2017 Mar;67(656):e201-e208. doi: 10.3399/bjgp16X688417. Epub 2017 Jan 30.
2
The impact of a diagnostic decision support system on the consultation: perceptions of GPs and patients.诊断决策支持系统对会诊的影响:全科医生和患者的看法。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2017 Jun 2;17(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s12911-017-0477-6.
3
Early diagnostic suggestions improve accuracy of GPs: a randomised controlled trial using computer-simulated patients.早期诊断建议提高全科医生的诊断准确性:一项使用计算机模拟患者的随机对照试验
Br J Gen Pract. 2015 Jan;65(630):e49-54. doi: 10.3399/bjgp15X683161.
4
Collective Intelligence Increases Diagnostic Accuracy in a General Practice Setting.群体智能提高了一般实践环境下的诊断准确性。
Med Decis Making. 2024 May;44(4):451-462. doi: 10.1177/0272989X241241001. Epub 2024 Apr 12.
5
Improved patient satisfaction and diagnostic accuracy in skin diseases with a Visual Clinical Decision Support System-A feasibility study with general practitioners.基于可视化临床决策支持系统提高皮肤病患者满意度和诊断准确性:一项全科医生参与的可行性研究。
PLoS One. 2020 Jul 29;15(7):e0235410. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235410. eCollection 2020.
6
Assessment of the potential impact of a reminder system on the reduction of diagnostic errors: a quasi-experimental study.评估提醒系统对减少诊断错误的潜在影响:一项准实验研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2006 Apr 28;6:22. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-6-22.
7
Missed opportunities for diagnosis: lessons learned from diagnostic errors in primary care.诊断错失的机会:从基层医疗中的诊断错误中吸取的教训
Br J Gen Pract. 2015 Dec;65(641):e838-44. doi: 10.3399/bjgp15X687889.
8
Quality of diagnostic coding and information flow from hospital to general practice.诊断编码质量以及从医院到全科医疗的信息流。
Inform Prim Care. 2004;12(4):227-34.
9
Training nurse practitioners for general practice. The EROS Project Team.培训执业护士从事全科医疗。EROS项目团队。
Br J Gen Pract. 1999 Jul;49(444):531-5.
10
Impact of a spirometry expert system on general practitioners' decision making.肺功能测定专家系统对全科医生决策的影响。
Eur Respir J. 2008 Jan;31(1):84-92. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00012007. Epub 2007 Jun 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Generative Artificial Intelligence in Primary Care: Qualitative Study of UK General Practitioners' Views.基层医疗中的生成式人工智能:对英国全科医生观点的定性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Aug 6;27:e74428. doi: 10.2196/74428.
2
Optimizing Clinical Decision Support System Functionality by Leveraging Specific Human-Computer Interaction Elements: Insights From a Systematic Review.通过利用特定人机交互元素优化临床决策支持系统功能:系统评价的见解
JMIR Hum Factors. 2025 May 6;12:e69333. doi: 10.2196/69333.
3
Association between cancer risk assessment tool use and GP consultation duration: an observational study.

本文引用的文献

1
What can be done to increase the use of diagnostic decision support systems?可以采取哪些措施来增加诊断决策支持系统的使用?
Diagnosis (Berl). 2014 Jan 1;1(1):119-123. doi: 10.1515/dx-2013-0014.
2
The Role of Physicians' First Impressions in the Diagnosis of Possible Cancers without Alarm Symptoms.医生的第一印象在无警示症状的可能癌症诊断中的作用
Med Decis Making. 2017 Jan;37(1):9-16. doi: 10.1177/0272989X16644563. Epub 2016 Apr 25.
3
Reducing diagnostic errors in primary care. A systematic meta-review of computerized diagnostic decision support systems by the LINNEAUS collaboration on patient safety in primary care.
癌症风险评估工具的使用与全科医生诊疗时长之间的关联:一项观察性研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2025 May 2;75(754):e349-e356. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2024.0135. Print 2025 May.
4
Rheumatology in the digital health era: status quo and quo vadis?数字健康时代的风湿病学:现状与未来走向?
Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2024 Dec;20(12):747-759. doi: 10.1038/s41584-024-01177-7. Epub 2024 Oct 31.
5
Collective Intelligence Increases Diagnostic Accuracy in a General Practice Setting.群体智能提高了一般实践环境下的诊断准确性。
Med Decis Making. 2024 May;44(4):451-462. doi: 10.1177/0272989X241241001. Epub 2024 Apr 12.
6
Workload and workflow implications associated with the use of electronic clinical decision support tools used by health professionals in general practice: a scoping review.工作负荷和工作流程对一般实践中医疗专业人员使用电子临床决策支持工具的影响:范围综述。
BMC Prim Care. 2023 Jan 20;24(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s12875-023-01973-2.
7
Influences of early diagnostic suggestions on clinical reasoning.早期诊断建议对临床推理的影响。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2022 Dec 15;7(1):103. doi: 10.1186/s41235-022-00453-y.
8
Assessing the Performance of a Novel Bayesian Algorithm at Point of Care for Red Eye Complaints.评估一种新型贝叶斯算法在即时医疗点对红眼症状的诊断性能。
Vision (Basel). 2022 Oct 24;6(4):64. doi: 10.3390/vision6040064.
9
Optimization of a Quality Improvement Tool for Cancer Diagnosis in Primary Care: Qualitative Study.基层医疗中癌症诊断质量改进工具的优化:定性研究
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Aug 4;6(8):e39277. doi: 10.2196/39277.
10
Algorithm-based advice taking and clinical judgement: impact of advice distance and algorithm information.基于算法的建议采纳和临床判断:建议距离和算法信息的影响。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2022 Jul 27;7(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s41235-022-00421-6.
减少基层医疗中的诊断错误。LINNEAUS基层医疗患者安全协作组对计算机化诊断决策支持系统进行的系统元综述。
Eur J Gen Pract. 2015 Sep;21 Suppl(sup1):8-13. doi: 10.3109/13814788.2015.1043123.
4
Dual-Process Theories of Higher Cognition: Advancing the Debate.双重加工理论的高阶认知:推进辩论。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2013 May;8(3):223-41. doi: 10.1177/1745691612460685.
5
Evidence-based rules from family practice to inform family practice; the learning healthcare system case study on urinary tract infections.基于证据的家庭医疗规则以指导家庭医疗;关于尿路感染的学习型医疗系统案例研究
BMC Fam Pract. 2015 May 16;16:63. doi: 10.1186/s12875-015-0271-4.
6
Early diagnostic suggestions improve accuracy of family physicians: a randomized controlled trial in Greece.早期诊断建议提高家庭医生的诊断准确性:希腊的一项随机对照试验
Fam Pract. 2015 Jun;32(3):323-8. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmv012. Epub 2015 Mar 23.
7
Early diagnostic suggestions improve accuracy of GPs: a randomised controlled trial using computer-simulated patients.早期诊断建议提高全科医生的诊断准确性:一项使用计算机模拟患者的随机对照试验
Br J Gen Pract. 2015 Jan;65(630):e49-54. doi: 10.3399/bjgp15X683161.
8
Comparing announced with unannounced standardized patients in performance assessment.在绩效评估中比较已公布与未公布的标准化病人。
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2013 Feb;39(2):83-8. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(13)39012-6.
9
Cognitive interventions to reduce diagnostic error: a narrative review.认知干预以减少诊断错误:叙述性综述。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2012 Jul;21(7):535-57. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000149. Epub 2012 Apr 27.
10
Differential diagnosis generators: an evaluation of currently available computer programs.鉴别诊断生成器:对现有计算机程序的评估。
J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Feb;27(2):213-9. doi: 10.1007/s11606-011-1804-8.