Le Vien T M, Le Hoan N, Pinheiro Marcos Gabriel, Hahn Kenneth J, Dinh Mary L, Larson Kajal B, Flanagan Shawn D, Badiou Cedric, Lina Gerard, Tkaczyk Christine, Sellman Bret R, Diep Binh An
Division of HIV, Infectious Diseases, and Global Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.
Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, New Jersey, USA.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2017 Mar 24;61(4). doi: 10.1128/AAC.02734-16. Print 2017 Apr.
The protective efficacy of tedizolid phosphate, a novel oxazolidinone that potently inhibits bacterial protein synthesis, was compared to those of linezolid, vancomycin, and saline in a rabbit model of necrotizing pneumonia. Tedizolid phosphate was administered to rabbits at 6 mg/kg of body weight intravenously twice daily, which yielded values of the 24-h area under the concentration-time curve approximating those found in humans. The overall survival rate was 83% for rabbits treated with 6 mg/kg tedizolid phosphate twice daily and 83% for those treated with 50 mg/kg linezolid thrice daily ( = 0.66 by the log-rank test versus the results obtained with tedizolid phosphate). These survival rates were significantly greater than the survival rates of 17% for rabbits treated with 30 mg/kg vancomycin twice daily ( = 0.003) and 17% for rabbits treated with saline ( = 0.002). The bacterial count in the lungs of rabbits treated with tedizolid phosphate was significantly decreased compared to that in the lungs of rabbits treated with saline, although it was not significantly different from that in the lungs of rabbits treated with vancomycin or linezolid. The bacterial production of alpha-toxin and Panton-Valentine leukocidin, two key -secreted toxins that play critical roles in the pathogenesis of necrotizing pneumonia, in the lungs of rabbits treated with tedizolid phosphate and linezolid was significantly inhibited compared to that in the lungs of rabbits treated with vancomycin or saline. Taken together, these results indicate that tedizolid phosphate is superior to vancomycin for the treatment of necrotizing pneumonia because it inhibits the bacterial production of lung-damaging toxins at the site of infection.
在坏死性肺炎兔模型中,将新型恶唑烷酮类药物磷酸特地唑胺(其能有效抑制细菌蛋白质合成)的保护效力与利奈唑胺、万古霉素及生理盐水进行了比较。以6mg/kg体重的剂量给兔子静脉注射磷酸特地唑胺,每日两次,其24小时浓度-时间曲线下面积值接近人体中的值。每日两次接受6mg/kg磷酸特地唑胺治疗的兔子的总生存率为83%,每日三次接受50mg/kg利奈唑胺治疗的兔子的总生存率也为83%(对数秩检验显示与磷酸特地唑胺治疗结果相比,P = 0.66)。这些生存率显著高于每日两次接受30mg/kg万古霉素治疗的兔子的17%生存率(P = 0.003)以及接受生理盐水治疗的兔子的17%生存率(P = 0.002)。与接受生理盐水治疗的兔子相比,接受磷酸特地唑胺治疗的兔子肺内细菌计数显著降低,尽管与接受万古霉素或利奈唑胺治疗的兔子肺内细菌计数相比无显著差异。与接受万古霉素或生理盐水治疗的兔子相比,接受磷酸特地唑胺和利奈唑胺治疗的兔子肺内α-毒素和杀白细胞素这两种在坏死性肺炎发病机制中起关键作用的主要分泌毒素的细菌产生受到显著抑制。综上所述,这些结果表明,磷酸特地唑胺在治疗坏死性肺炎方面优于万古霉素,因为它能在感染部位抑制对肺有损害作用的毒素的细菌产生。