Suppr超能文献

胆碱酯酶抑制剂的耐受性:一项基于人群的持续性、依从性和换药情况研究。

Tolerability of Cholinesterase Inhibitors: A Population-Based Study of Persistence, Adherence, and Switching.

作者信息

Fisher Anat, Carney Greg, Bassett Ken, Dormuth Colin R

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of British Columbia, 2176 Health Sciences Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z3, Canada.

Department of Family Medicine, University of British Columbia, 5950 University Boulevard, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z3, Canada.

出版信息

Drugs Aging. 2017 Mar;34(3):221-231. doi: 10.1007/s40266-017-0438-x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cholinesterase inhibitors (ChEIs) are prescribed to dementia patients despite their poor tolerance. Low tolerability potentially reduces persistence and adherence, while inducing switching between medications. Comparisons of these utilization measures contribute to knowledge of the relative tolerability of these medications.

AIM

The aim was to compare persistence, adherence, and switching between donepezil, galantamine, oral rivastigmine, and rivastigmine patch.

METHODS

A population-based cohort study, using British Columbia claims data (2009-2013), assessed ChEI new users aged 40 and older. We conducted survival analysis to compare persistence and Poisson regression to estimate switching rates. Good adherence, defined as a medication possession ratio of ≥80%, was modeled using log-binomial regression. Analyses were adjusted using propensity scores.

RESULTS

Patients on galantamine had longer mean persistence and better adherence compared with patients on donepezil, with a hazard ratio for discontinuation of 0.91 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.87-0.96] and a relative risk for good adherence of 1.01 (95% CI 1.002-1.03). Rivastigmine was associated with the shortest mean persistence [3.6 months (95% CI 3.0-4.2) and 5.0 (95% CI 4.7-5.3) for oral and patch, respectively] and the highest mean switching rates. Comparing the two rivastigmine preparations, the patch was associated with decreased discontinuation compared with oral [hazard ratio 0.79 (95% CI 0.71-0.89)] and decreased switching [relative risk 0.63 (95% CI 0.46-0.87) during the first 6 months of treatment]. Paradoxically, the patch was also associated with poorer adherence [relative risk for good adherence 0.94 (95% CI 0.91-0.98)] than the oral formulation.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on estimates of persistence, adherence, and switching, galantamine was the best tolerated ChEI and rivastigmine the least.

摘要

背景

尽管痴呆患者对胆碱酯酶抑制剂(ChEIs)耐受性较差,但仍会使用这些药物。耐受性差可能会降低用药持续性和依从性,同时导致药物转换。对这些使用指标进行比较有助于了解这些药物的相对耐受性。

目的

比较多奈哌齐、加兰他敏、口服卡巴拉汀和卡巴拉汀透皮贴剂在用药持续性、依从性和药物转换方面的差异。

方法

一项基于人群的队列研究,使用不列颠哥伦比亚省的索赔数据(2009 - 2013年),评估40岁及以上的ChEI新用户。我们进行了生存分析以比较用药持续性,并使用泊松回归来估计药物转换率。将药物持有率≥80%定义为良好依从性,使用对数二项回归进行建模。分析采用倾向得分进行调整。

结果

与使用多奈哌齐的患者相比,使用加兰他敏的患者平均用药持续性更长,依从性更好,停药风险比为0.91[95%置信区间(CI)0.87 - 0.96],良好依从性的相对风险为1.01(95%CI 1.002 - 1.03)。卡巴拉汀与最短的平均用药持续性相关[口服制剂为3.6个月(95%CI 3.0 - 4.2),透皮贴剂为5.0个月(95%CI 4.7 - 5.3)],且平均药物转换率最高。比较两种卡巴拉汀制剂,透皮贴剂与口服制剂相比,停药风险降低[风险比0.79(95%CI 0.71 - 0.89)],在治疗的前6个月内药物转换减少[相对风险0.63(95%CI 0.46 - 0.87)]。矛盾的是,与口服制剂相比,透皮贴剂的依从性也较差[良好依从性的相对风险0.94(95%CI 0.91 - 0.98)]。

结论

基于用药持续性、依从性和药物转换的估计,加兰他敏是耐受性最好的ChEI,而卡巴拉汀耐受性最差。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验