CORR Insights: No Clinically Important Difference in Knee Scores or Instability Between Transtibial and Inlay Techniques for PCL Reconstruction: A Systematic Review.
作者信息
Fu Freddie H
机构信息
University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 3471 5th Avenue, Suite 1011 Kaufmann Building, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.
出版信息
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Apr;475(4):1249-1251. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-5206-4. Epub 2017 Jan 30.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
CORR Insights: No Clinically Important Difference in Knee Scores or Instability Between Transtibial and Inlay Techniques for PCL Reconstruction: A Systematic Review.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Apr;475(4):1249-1251. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-5206-4. Epub 2017 Jan 30.
2
No Clinically Important Difference in Knee Scores or Instability Between Transtibial and Inlay Techniques for PCL Reconstruction: A Systematic Review.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Apr;475(4):1239-1248. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-5176-6. Epub 2016 Nov 28.
3
Transtibial versus tibial inlay techniques for posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: long-term follow-up study.
Am J Sports Med. 2014 Dec;42(12):2964-71. doi: 10.1177/0363546514550982. Epub 2014 Oct 6.
4
Tibial inlay technique with quadriceps tendon-bone autograft for posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
Arthroscopy. 2004 Mar;20(3):331-5. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2003.11.043.
5
Posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using single-bundle patella tendon graft with tibial inlay fixation: 2- to 10-year follow-up.
Am J Sports Med. 2004 Mar;32(2):346-60. doi: 10.1177/0363546503261511.
6
Is the all-arthroscopic tibial inlay double-bundle PCL reconstruction a viable option in multiligament knee injuries?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Sep;472(9):2667-79. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3796-2.
7
Posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction via tibial inlay technique in multiligament knee injuries.
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2015;49(6):579-85. doi: 10.3944/AOTT.2015.14.0443.
8
Transtibial versus inlay posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: an evidence-based systematic review.
J Knee Surg. 2010 Jun;23(2):73-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1267468.
9
No difference in subjective and objective clinical outcomes between arthroscopic transtibial and open inlay posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction techniques in the treatment of multi-ligamentous knee injuries.
Knee. 2021 Jun;30:18-25. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2021.03.002. Epub 2021 Apr 1.
10
A novel posteromedial approach for tibial inlay PCL reconstruction in KDIIIM injuries: avoiding prone patient positioning.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Sep;472(9):2680-90. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3557-2.
本文引用的文献
1
Restoring Nature Through Individualized Anatomic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Surgery.
Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2016 Oct;4(4):289-290.
2
Biomechanical Comparison of Five Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Techniques.
J Knee Surg. 2017 Jul;30(6):523-531. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1593625. Epub 2016 Oct 25.
3
Anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a changing paradigm.
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015 Mar;23(3):640-8. doi: 10.1007/s00167-014-3209-9. Epub 2014 Aug 3.
4
Comparison of single-bundle and double-bundle isolated posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with allograft: a prospective, randomized study.
Arthroscopy. 2014 Jun;30(6):695-700. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2014.02.035. Epub 2014 Apr 14.
5
Tibial Inlay Press-fit Fixation Versus Interference Screw in Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.
Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2013 Nov 6;5(4):e35. doi: 10.4081/or.2013.e35. eCollection 2013.
6
Kinematic analysis of the posterior cruciate ligament, part 2: a comparison of anatomic single- versus double-bundle reconstruction.
Am J Sports Med. 2013 Dec;41(12):2839-48. doi: 10.1177/0363546513504384. Epub 2013 Oct 3.
7
Evaluation of the clinical results of posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction -a comparison between the use of the bone tendon bone and semitendinosus and gracilis tendons-.
Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Ther Technol. 2012 Aug 29;4(1):30. doi: 10.1186/1758-2555-4-30.
8
Double bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: surgical technique and results.
Sports Med Arthrosc Rev. 2010 Dec;18(4):242-8. doi: 10.1097/JSA.0b013e3181f2faa1.
9
Comparison of the clinical results of three posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction techniques: surgical technique.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010 Sep;92 Suppl 1 Pt 2:145-57. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.J.00185.
10
Comparison of tibial graft fixation between simulated arthroscopic and open inlay techniques for posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
Am J Sports Med. 2007 Oct;35(10):1731-8. doi: 10.1177/0363546507302216. Epub 2007 Jun 6.
Zotero 插件