• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

五种后交叉韧带重建技术的生物力学比较

Biomechanical Comparison of Five Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Techniques.

作者信息

Nuelle Clayton W, Milles Jeffrey L, Pfeiffer Ferris M, Stannard James P, Smith Patrick A, Kfuri Mauricio, Cook James L

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri.

Thompson Laboratory for Regenerative Orthopaedics, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri.

出版信息

J Knee Surg. 2017 Jul;30(6):523-531. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1593625. Epub 2016 Oct 25.

DOI:10.1055/s-0036-1593625
PMID:27780285
Abstract

No surgical technique recreates native posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) biomechanics. We compared the biomechanics of five different PCL reconstruction techniques versus the native PCL. Cadaveric knees ( = 20) were randomly assigned to one of five reconstruction techniques: Single bundle all-inside arthroscopic inlay, single bundle all-inside suspensory fixation, single bundle arthroscopic-assisted open onlay (SB-ONL), double bundle arthroscopic-assisted open inlay (DB-INL), and double bundle all-inside suspensory fixation (DB-SUSP). Each specimen was potted and connected to a servo-hydraulic load frame for testing in three conditions: PCL intact, PCL deficient, and PCL reconstructed. Testing consisted of a posterior force up to 100 N at a rate of 1 N/s at four knee flexion angles: 10, 30, 60, and 90 degrees. Three material properties were measured under each condition: load to 5 mm displacement, maximal displacement, and stiffness. Data were normalized to the native PCL, compared across techniques, compared with all PCL-intact knees and to all PCL-deficient knees using one-way analysis of variance. For load to 5 mm displacement, intact knees required significantly ( < 0.03) more load at 30 degrees of flexion than all reconstructions except the DB-SUSP. At 60 degrees of flexion, intact required significantly ( < 0.01) more load than all others except the SB-ONL. At 90 degrees, intact, SB-ONL, DB-INL, and DB-SUSP required significantly more load ( < 0.05). Maximal displacement testing showed the intact to have significantly ( < 0.02) less laxity than all others except the DB-INL and DB-SUSP at 60 degrees. At 90 degrees the intact showed significantly ( < 0.01) less laxity than all others except the DB-SUSP. The intact was significantly stiffer than all others at 30 degrees ( < 0.03) and 60 degrees ( < 0.01). Finally, the intact was significantly ( < 0.05) stiffer than all others except the DB-SUSP at 90 degrees. No technique matched the exact properties of the native PCL, but the double bundle reconstructions more closely recreated the native biomechanics immediately after implantation, with the DB-SUSP coming closest to the native ligament. This study contributes new data for consideration in PCL reconstruction technique choice.

摘要

没有一种手术技术能够重现天然后交叉韧带(PCL)的生物力学特性。我们比较了五种不同PCL重建技术与天然PCL的生物力学特性。将20具尸体膝关节随机分配至五种重建技术之一:单束全关节镜下嵌入法、单束全关节镜下悬吊固定法、单束关节镜辅助切开覆盖法(SB-ONL)、双束关节镜辅助切开嵌入法(DB-INL)以及双束全关节镜下悬吊固定法(DB-SUSP)。每个标本被固定并连接到一个伺服液压加载框架上,在三种状态下进行测试:PCL完整、PCL缺损以及PCL重建。测试包括在四个膝关节屈曲角度(10°、30°、60°和90°)以1N/s的速率施加高达100N的后向力。在每种状态下测量三种材料特性:5mm位移时的载荷、最大位移以及刚度。数据以天然PCL为参照进行标准化,在不同技术之间进行比较,并使用单因素方差分析与所有PCL完整的膝关节以及所有PCL缺损的膝关节进行比较。对于5mm位移时的载荷,在30°屈曲时,完整膝关节所需的载荷显著(P<0.03)高于除DB-SUSP之外的所有重建方法。在60°屈曲时,完整膝关节所需的载荷显著(P<0.01)高于除SB-ONL之外的所有其他方法。在90°时,完整膝关节、SB-ONL、DB-INL和DB-SUSP所需的载荷显著更高(P<0.05)。最大位移测试显示,在60°时,完整膝关节的松弛度显著(P<0.02)低于除DB-INL和DB-SUSP之外的所有其他方法。在90°时,完整膝关节的松弛度显著(P<0.01)低于除DB-SUSP之外的所有其他方法。在30°(P<0.03)和60°(P<0.01)时,完整膝关节的刚度显著高于所有其他方法。最后,在90°时,完整膝关节的刚度显著(P<0.05)高于除DB-SUSP之外的所有其他方法。没有一种技术能够完全匹配天然PCL的特性,但双束重建技术在植入后能更接近地重现天然生物力学特性,其中DB-SUSP最接近天然韧带。本研究为PCL重建技术的选择提供了新的数据以供参考。

相似文献

1
Biomechanical Comparison of Five Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Techniques.五种后交叉韧带重建技术的生物力学比较
J Knee Surg. 2017 Jul;30(6):523-531. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1593625. Epub 2016 Oct 25.
2
Biomechanical Comparison: Single-Bundle versus Double-Bundle Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Techniques.生物力学比较:单束与双束后交叉韧带重建技术
J Knee Surg. 2017 May;30(4):347-351. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1588014. Epub 2016 Aug 20.
3
Onlay Reconstruction of the Posterior Cruciate Ligament: Biomechanical Comparison of Unicortical and Bicortical Tibial Fixation.后交叉韧带的覆盖重建:单皮质与双皮质胫骨固定的生物力学比较
J Knee Surg. 2019 Oct;32(10):972-978. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1672205. Epub 2018 Oct 3.
4
Tibial Slope and Its Effect on Graft Force in Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstructions.胫骨倾斜度及其对后交叉韧带重建中移植物力的影响。
Am J Sports Med. 2019 Apr;47(5):1168-1174. doi: 10.1177/0363546519827958. Epub 2019 Mar 21.
5
Posterior cruciate ligament graft fixation angles, part 2: biomechanical evaluation for anatomic double-bundle reconstruction.后交叉韧带移植物固定角度,第2部分:解剖双束重建的生物力学评估
Am J Sports Med. 2014 Oct;42(10):2346-55. doi: 10.1177/0363546514541226. Epub 2014 Aug 4.
6
A Comprehensive Meta-analysis of Clinical and Biomechanical Outcomes Comparing Double-Bundle and Single-Bundle Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Techniques.双束与单束后交叉韧带重建技术的临床与生物力学效果的全面荟萃分析
Am J Sports Med. 2023 Nov;51(13):3567-3582. doi: 10.1177/03635465221137059. Epub 2022 Dec 19.
7
Posterior cruciate ligament graft fixation angles, part 1: biomechanical evaluation for anatomic single-bundle reconstruction.后交叉韧带移植物固定角度,第1部分:解剖单束重建的生物力学评估
Am J Sports Med. 2014 Oct;42(10):2338-45. doi: 10.1177/0363546514541225. Epub 2014 Aug 4.
8
Dynamic Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography Mapping of Isometric Posterior Cruciate Ligament Attachment Sites on the Tibia and Femur: Single- Versus Double-Bundle Analysis.动态三维计算机断层扫描成像技术对胫骨和股骨后交叉韧带等距附着点的分析:单束与双束比较。
Arthroscopy. 2020 Nov;36(11):2875-2884. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2020.06.006. Epub 2020 Jun 15.
9
Comparison of a double bundle arthroscopic inlay and open inlay posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using clinically relevant tools: a cadaveric study.使用临床相关工具对双束关节镜下嵌入和开放嵌入后交叉韧带重建进行比较:一项尸体研究
Arthroscopy. 2008 Apr;24(4):472-80. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2007.09.012. Epub 2008 Jan 7.
10
[An experimental study of split-double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in single femoral tunnel].单股骨隧道内双束后交叉韧带重建的实验研究
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2007 Aug;21(8):820-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Onlay Technique for Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: The Paccola's Technique.后交叉韧带重建的覆盖技术:帕科拉技术。
Arthrosc Tech. 2023 Apr 24;12(5):e593-e602. doi: 10.1016/j.eats.2022.12.013. eCollection 2023 May.
2
No Difference in Knee Kinematics Between Anterior Cruciate Ligament-First and Posterior Cruciate Ligament-First Fixation During Single-Stage Multiligament Knee Reconstruction: A Biomechanical Study.单阶段多韧带膝关节重建中前交叉韧带优先固定与后交叉韧带优先固定之间膝关节运动学无差异:一项生物力学研究
Orthop J Sports Med. 2022 Sep 28;10(9):23259671221118587. doi: 10.1177/23259671221118587. eCollection 2022 Sep.
3
Single versus double bundle in posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction: a meta-analysis.
单束与双束重建后交叉韧带(PCL):一项荟萃分析。
Sci Rep. 2022 Mar 9;12(1):4160. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-07976-w.
4
Evolving evidence in the treatment of primary and recurrent posterior cruciate ligament injuries, part 2: surgical techniques, outcomes and rehabilitation.后交叉韧带初次及复发性损伤治疗中证据的演变,第 2 部分:手术技术、结果及康复。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021 Mar;29(3):682-693. doi: 10.1007/s00167-020-06337-2. Epub 2020 Oct 30.
5
Successful reconstruction of the posterior cruciate ligament: assessment of posterior cruciate ligament footprints using an objective coordinate system.成功重建后交叉韧带:使用客观坐标系评估后交叉韧带止点。
Surg Radiol Anat. 2020 Oct;42(10):1219-1223. doi: 10.1007/s00276-020-02520-9. Epub 2020 Jun 17.
6
Thick Graft Versus Double-Bundle Technique on Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Experimental Biomechanical Study with Cadavers.厚移植物与双束技术在后交叉韧带重建中的应用:尸体实验生物力学研究
Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo). 2019 Sep;54(5):531-539. doi: 10.1016/j.rboe.2017.12.010. Epub 2019 Oct 29.
7
An extended OpenSim knee model for analysis of strains of connective tissues.用于分析结缔组织应变的扩展 OpenSim 膝关节模型。
Biomed Eng Online. 2018 Apr 17;17(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s12938-018-0474-8.
8
Biomechanical Analysis of Capsular Repair Versus Arthrex TFCC Ulnar Tunnel Repair for Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex Tears.三角纤维软骨复合体撕裂的关节囊修复与 Arthrex 尺侧腕伸肌腱鞘管修复的生物力学分析
Hand (N Y). 2019 Jul;14(4):547-553. doi: 10.1177/1558944717750920. Epub 2018 Jan 11.
9
The Evolving Treatment Patterns of NCAA Division I Football Players by Orthopaedic Team Physicians Over the Past Decade, 2008-2016.过去十年(2008-2016 年),NCAA 一级足球运动员的骨科队医治疗模式不断演变。
Sports Health. 2018 May/Jun;10(3):234-243. doi: 10.1177/1941738117745488. Epub 2018 Jan 3.
10
CORR Insights: No Clinically Important Difference in Knee Scores or Instability Between Transtibial and Inlay Techniques for PCL Reconstruction: A Systematic Review.CORR 见解:后交叉韧带重建中经胫骨技术与嵌体技术在膝关节评分或稳定性方面无临床重要差异:一项系统评价
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Apr;475(4):1249-1251. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-5206-4. Epub 2017 Jan 30.