Srivastava Manjita, Singh Neha, Dixit Vinod Kumar, Nath Gopal, Jain Ashok Kumar
Department of Gastroenterology, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India.
Department of Microbiology, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India.
Indian J Med Res. 2016 Sep;144(3):424-432. doi: 10.4103/0971-5916.198674.
BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES: Reduction of viraemia in patients with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection using nucleoside/nucleotide analogues reduces fatal liver disease-related events, but development of resistance in virus presents serious clinical challenge. Therefore, comparative evaluation of prolonged antiviral monotherapy and combination therapies was prospectively studied to assess their influence on viral suppression, rapidity of response, development of drug resistance and surfacing mutants in chronic liver disease (CLD) patients.
A total of 158 (62eAg-ve) chronic hepatitis B patients were prospectively studied for 24 months. Final analysis was performed on patients treated with lamivudine (LAM, n = 28), adefovirdipivoxil (ADV, n = 24), tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF, n = 26), entecavir (ETV, n = 25), LAM + ADV (n = 28) and LAM + TDF (n = 27). Quantitative hepatitis B virus DNA was detected using real-time polymerase chain reaction. Multiple comparisons among drugs and genotypic mutations were analyzed.
Progressive biochemical and virological response were noted with all the regimens at 24 months except LAM and ADV which were associated with viral breakthrough (VBT) in 46.4 and 25 per cent, respectively. Mutations: rtM204V (39.3%), M204V+L180M (10.7%) while rtA181V (8.1%) and rtN236T (8.3%) were observed with LAM and ADV regimen, respectively. LAM + ADV combination therapy revealed VBT in seven per cent of the cases without mutations whereas TDF, ETV and LAM + TDF therapies neither showed VBT nor mutations.
INTERPRETATION & CONCLUSIONS: LAM was the least potent drug among all therapeutic options followed by ADV. TDF and ETV were genetically stable antivirals with a strong efficacy. Among newer combination therapies, LAM + TDF revealed more efficacy in virological remission and acted as a profound genetic barrier on long term. Hence, newer generation molecules (TDF, ETV) and effective combination therapy should be a certain choice.
使用核苷/核苷酸类似物降低慢性乙型肝炎病毒(HBV)感染患者的病毒血症可减少致命性肝病相关事件,但病毒耐药性的出现带来了严峻的临床挑战。因此,对延长的抗病毒单药治疗和联合治疗进行了前瞻性比较评估,以评估它们对慢性肝病(CLD)患者病毒抑制、反应速度、耐药性发展及表面突变体的影响。
对158例(62例e抗原阴性)慢性乙型肝炎患者进行了为期24个月的前瞻性研究。对接受拉米夫定(LAM,n = 28)、阿德福韦酯(ADV,n = 24)、替诺福韦酯(TDF,n = 26)、恩替卡韦(ETV,n = 25)、LAM + ADV(n = 28)和LAM + TDF(n = 27)治疗的患者进行了最终分析。采用实时聚合酶链反应检测乙型肝炎病毒DNA定量。分析了药物之间的多重比较和基因分型突变。
除LAM和ADV外,所有治疗方案在24个月时均观察到生化和病毒学反应的进展,LAM和ADV分别有46.4%和25%的患者出现病毒突破(VBT)。突变情况:LAM治疗方案观察到rtM204V(39.3%)、M204V + L180M(10.7%),而ADV治疗方案分别观察到rtA181V(8.1%)和rtN236T(8.3%)。LAM + ADV联合治疗有7%的病例出现VBT但无突变,而TDF、ETV和LAM + TDF治疗既未出现VBT也未出现突变。
LAM是所有治疗方案中效力最低的药物,其次是ADV。TDF和ETV是基因稳定的抗病毒药物,疗效显著。在较新的联合治疗中,LAM + TDF在病毒学缓解方面显示出更高的疗效,并且长期来看是一个强大的基因屏障。因此,新一代分子(TDF、ETV)和有效的联合治疗应是必然选择。