Sundén-Cullberg Jonas, Rylance Rebecca, Svefors Jesper, Norrby-Teglund Anna, Björk Jonas, Inghammar Malin
1Division of Infectious Diseases and Center for Infectious Medicine, Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institutet at Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge, Sweden.2National Registry Centre, Skåne University Hospital Lund, Skåne, Sweden.3Department of Infectious Diseases, Ryhov Hospital, Jönköping, Sweden.4Division of occupational and environmental medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.5Department of Clinical Sciences, Section for Infection Medicine, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Crit Care Med. 2017 Apr;45(4):591-599. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002249.
To study the prognostic value of fever in the emergency department in septic patients subsequently admitted to the ICU.
Observational cohort study from the Swedish national quality register for sepsis.
Thirty ICU's in Sweden.
Two thousand two hundred twenty-five adults who were admitted to an ICU within 24 hours of hospital arrival with a diagnosis of severe sepsis or septic shock were included.
None.
Body temperature was measured and classified according to four categories (< 37°C, 37-38.29°C, 38.3-39.5°C, ≥ 39.5°C). The main outcome was in-hospital mortality. Odds ratios for mortality according to body temperature were estimated using multivariable logistic regression. Subgroup analyses were conducted according to age, sex, underlying comorbidity, and time to given antibiotics. Overall mortality was 25%. More than half of patients had a body temperature below 38.3°C. Mortality was inversely correlated with temperature and decreased, on average, more than 5% points per °C increase, from 50% in those with the lowest temperatures to 9% in those with the highest. Increased body temperature in survivors was also associated with shorter hospital stays. Patients with fever received better quality of care, but the inverse association between body temperature and mortality was robust and remained consistent after adjustment for quality of care measures and other factors that could have confounded the association. Among vital signs, body temperature was best at predicting mortality.
Contrary to common perceptions and current guidelines for care of critically ill septic patients, increased body temperature in the emergency department was strongly associated with lower mortality and shorter hospital stays in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock subsequently admitted to the ICU.
研究急诊科发热对随后入住重症监护病房(ICU)的脓毒症患者的预后价值。
基于瑞典脓毒症国家质量登记系统的观察性队列研究。
瑞典的30个ICU。
纳入2225名成年患者,他们在入院后24小时内被诊断为严重脓毒症或脓毒性休克并入住ICU。
无。
测量体温并分为四类(<37°C、37 - 38.29°C、38.3 - 39.5°C、≥39.5°C)。主要结局为院内死亡率。使用多变量逻辑回归估计根据体温得出的死亡比值比。根据年龄、性别、基础合并症和给予抗生素的时间进行亚组分析。总体死亡率为25%。超过一半的患者体温低于38.3°C。死亡率与体温呈负相关,平均每升高1°C死亡率降低超过5个百分点,从体温最低者的50%降至体温最高者的9%。幸存者体温升高也与住院时间缩短相关。发热患者接受了更好的护理质量,但在调整护理质量措施和其他可能混淆该关联的因素后,体温与死亡率之间的负相关仍然显著且保持一致。在生命体征中,体温对死亡率的预测效果最佳。
与普遍认知和当前重症脓毒症患者护理指南相反,急诊科体温升高与随后入住ICU的严重脓毒症或脓毒性休克患者的较低死亡率和较短住院时间密切相关。