Suppr超能文献

一种结合结构和功能缺陷的新型青光眼严重程度评分

A New Glaucoma Severity Score Combining Structural and Functional Defects.

作者信息

Wachtl J, Töteberg-Harms M, Frimmel S, Kniestedt C

机构信息

University Hospital Zurich, Department of Ophthalmology, Zurich, Switzerland.

出版信息

Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2017 Apr;234(4):468-473. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-123725. Epub 2017 Jan 31.

Abstract

In order to assess glaucoma severity and to compare the success of surgical and medical therapy and study outcomes, an objective and independent staging tool is necessary. A combination of information from both structural and functional testing is probably the best approach to stage glaucomatous damage. There has been no universally accepted standard for glaucoma staging. The aim of this study was to develop a Glaucoma Severity Score (GSS) for objective assessment of a patient's glaucoma severity, combining both functional and structural information. The Glaucoma Severity Score includes the following 3 criteria: superior and inferior Retinal Nerve Fibre Layer (RNFL) thickness, perimetric mean defect (MD), and agreement of anatomical and perimetric defects, as assessed by two glaucoma specialists. The specialists defined a staging tool for each of the 3 criteria in a consensus process, assigning specific characteristics to a scale value between 0 and 2 or 0 and 3, respectively. The GSS ranges between 0 and 10 points. In a prospective observational study, the data of 112 glaucoma patients were assessed independently by the two specialists according to this staging tool. The GSS was applied to 112 eyes and patients (59.8 % female) with a mean age of 66.3 ± 13.1 years. Mean GSS was 4.73 points. Cohen's kappa coefficient was determined to measure inter-rater agreement between glaucoma specialists for the third criterion. With κ = 0.83, the agreement was very good. Thus, all 3 criteria of the GSS may be regarded as objective. The Glaucoma Severity Score is an objective tool, combining both structural and functional characteristics, and permitting comparison of different patients, populations and studies. The Glaucoma Severity Score has proven effective in the objective assessment of 112 glaucoma patients and is relatively user-friendly in clinical practice. A comparative study of the GSS with the results of the FORUM® Glaucoma Workplace (Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Jena, Germany) will be the next step. If outcomes match, the Glaucoma Severity Score can be accepted as a promising tool to stage glaucoma and monitor changes objectively in patients when comparing glaucoma progression in study analyses.

摘要

为了评估青光眼的严重程度,比较手术和药物治疗的效果以及研究结果,需要一种客观、独立的分期工具。结合结构和功能测试信息可能是对青光眼损害进行分期的最佳方法。目前尚无被普遍接受的青光眼分期标准。本研究的目的是开发一种青光眼严重程度评分(GSS),用于客观评估患者的青光眼严重程度,该评分结合了功能和结构信息。青光眼严重程度评分包括以下3项标准:视网膜神经纤维层(RNFL)上下厚度、视野平均缺损(MD)以及由两位青光眼专家评估的解剖学和视野缺损的一致性。专家们在一个共识过程中为这3项标准中的每一项定义了一个分期工具,分别为0至2或0至3的量表值赋予特定特征。GSS的范围是0至10分。在一项前瞻性观察研究中,两位专家根据此分期工具对112例青光眼患者的数据进行了独立评估。GSS应用于112只眼和患者(女性占59.8%),平均年龄为66.3±13.1岁。平均GSS为4.73分。通过计算科恩kappa系数来衡量青光眼专家在第三个标准上的评分者间一致性。κ=0.83,一致性非常好。因此,GSS的所有3项标准都可被视为客观的。青光眼严重程度评分是一种客观工具,结合了结构和功能特征,允许对不同患者、人群和研究进行比较。青光眼严重程度评分已被证明在对112例青光眼患者的客观评估中有效,且在临床实践中相对易于使用。下一步将对GSS与FORUM®青光眼工作站(德国耶拿卡尔蔡司医疗技术股份公司)的结果进行比较研究。如果结果相符,青光眼严重程度评分可被视为一种有前景的工具,用于在研究分析中比较青光眼进展时对青光眼进行分期并客观监测患者的变化。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验