Suppr超能文献

癌症患者长期中心静脉通路的治疗效果、成本比较及患者满意度:来自印度南部一家三级癌症护理机构的经验

Outcomes, cost comparison, and patient satisfaction during long-term central venous access in cancer patients: Experience from a Tertiary Care Cancer Institute in South India.

作者信息

Babu K Govind, Suresh Babu M C, Lokanatha D, Bhat Gita R

机构信息

Department of Medical Oncology, Kidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.

出版信息

Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol. 2016 Oct-Dec;37(4):232-238. doi: 10.4103/0971-5851.195732.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Prolonged treatment, frequent administration of chemotherapy, antibiotics and blood products in cancer patients requires long term venous access. Central venous catheters (CVC) inserted into the subclavian vein or internal jugular vein, peripherally inserted central venous catheters (PICC) and chemoport (CP) are the commonly used central venous access devices (CVAD).

AIM

This study was envisaged to review our experience of CVADs over a one year period and analyze the outcome with regard to catheter life, reasons for removal, complications, patient satisfaction and cost comparison between the CVAD types in the Indian setting.

SETTINGS AND DESIGN

This was a prospective, observational study carried out in a tertiary care cancer institute.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

180 CVADs placed in patients with hematological malignancies and solid tumors from January 2014 to December 2014 were included.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED

Data was analyzed using descriptive statistics, Mann Whitney U test. <0.05 was taken as statistically significant.

RESULTS

180 CVADs were placed in 160 patients. The median catheter indwelling period was 76 days (16 days to 313 days) for CVC, 59 days (20days - 313 days) for PICC and 137 days (70 days - 258 days) for CP. 66 out of 160 patients developed complications (41.2%). 108 complication events were noted in 66 patients. There were 40 episodes of CRBSI. Out of the 68 mechanical complications, 37 were encountered during insertion of the CVAD and 31 were during the catheter indwelling period. Out of 160 patients, 138 (86.25%) were satisfied with the CVAD. The cost incurred for CVC/PICC (INR 4,480) was lower than that for CP (INR 24,150) and it was statistically significant ( < 0.0001). Our patients were highly satisfied with the CVAD.

CONCLUSION

Use of CVC and PICC is a safe, reliable and cost saving way of administration of chemotherapy in developing countries. The incidence of complications and catheter loss was acceptable. Our patients were highly satisfied with the CVAD.

摘要

引言

癌症患者需要长期静脉通路来进行延长治疗、频繁给予化疗药物、抗生素和血液制品。插入锁骨下静脉或颈内静脉的中心静脉导管(CVC)、外周静脉穿刺中心静脉导管(PICC)和化疗端口(CP)是常用的中心静脉通路装置(CVAD)。

目的

本研究旨在回顾我们在一年时间内使用CVAD的经验,并分析导管使用寿命、拔除原因、并发症、患者满意度以及印度背景下不同类型CVAD之间的成本比较等结果。

设置与设计

这是一项在三级癌症护理机构进行的前瞻性观察研究。

材料与方法

纳入2014年1月至2014年12月期间为血液系统恶性肿瘤和实体瘤患者放置的180根CVAD。

所用统计分析方法

采用描述性统计、曼-惠特尼U检验对数据进行分析。P<0.05被视为具有统计学意义。

结果

160例患者共放置了180根CVAD。CVC的中位导管留置时间为76天(16天至313天),PICC为59天(20天至313天),CP为137天(70天至258天)。160例患者中有66例(41.2%)出现并发症。66例患者共发生108次并发症事件。有40例CRBSI(导管相关血流感染)。在68例机械性并发症中,37例发生在CVAD插入过程中;31例发生在导管留置期间。160例患者中,138例(86.25%)对CVAD满意。CVC/PICC的成本(4480印度卢比)低于CP(24150印度卢比),且具有统计学意义(P<0.0001)。我们的患者对CVAD高度满意。

结论

在发展中国家,使用CVC和PICC是一种安全、可靠且节省成本的化疗给药方式。并发症和导管丢失的发生率是可以接受的。我们的患者对CVAD高度满意。

相似文献

2
Comparative thrombosis risk of vascular access devices among critically ill medical patients.
Thromb Res. 2018 Dec;172:54-60. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2018.10.013. Epub 2018 Oct 19.
6
Peripherally inserted central catheters revisited.
Am J Surg. 1998 Aug;176(2):208-11. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(98)00121-4.
8
A study of the use of peripherally inserted central catheters in cancer patients: A single-center experience.
J Vasc Nurs. 2018 Sep;36(3):149-156. doi: 10.1016/j.jvn.2018.05.001. Epub 2018 Jul 4.
9
A comparison of infections and complications in central venous catheters in adults with solid tumours.
J Vasc Access. 2015 Jan-Feb;16(1):38-41. doi: 10.5301/jva.5000300. Epub 2014 Sep 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of chemoport and Hickman central venous catheters in patients with hematological cancer.
Transl Cancer Res. 2025 Apr 30;14(4):2290-2302. doi: 10.21037/tcr-24-2147. Epub 2025 Apr 7.
2
Experience with Central Venous Access Devices in Hematology Practice from Resource Constraint Settings.
Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus. 2024 Apr;40(2):353-355. doi: 10.1007/s12288-023-01700-y. Epub 2023 Sep 19.
4
Clinical study of complications of a peripherally inserted central catheter in cancer patients.
Nurs Open. 2023 Jul;10(7):4480-4489. doi: 10.1002/nop2.1690. Epub 2023 Feb 28.
6
Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter Placement in a Cardiology Ward: A Focus Group Study of Nurses' Perspectives.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 17;18(14):7618. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18147618.
7
Chemoport Insertion-Less Is More.
Indian J Surg Oncol. 2021 Mar;12(1):139-145. doi: 10.1007/s13193-020-01265-6. Epub 2021 Jan 7.
8
Long-term vascular access in differently resourced settings: a review of indications, devices, techniques, and complications.
Pediatr Surg Int. 2020 May;36(5):551-562. doi: 10.1007/s00383-020-04640-0. Epub 2020 Mar 21.
9
Evaluation of complications of totally implantable central venous port system insertion.
Exp Ther Med. 2019 Mar;17(3):2013-2018. doi: 10.3892/etm.2019.7185. Epub 2019 Jan 18.
10
Comparison of three types of central venous catheters in patients with malignant tumor receiving chemotherapy.
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2017 Jul 12;11:1197-1204. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S142556. eCollection 2017.

本文引用的文献

1
A prospective observational study of the outcome of central venous catheterization in 100 patients.
Anesth Essays Res. 2013 Jan-Apr;7(1):71-5. doi: 10.4103/0259-1162.114000.
2
A retrospective study of central venous catheters GCRI experience.
Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol. 2013 Oct;34(4):238-41. doi: 10.4103/0971-5851.125234.
4
Central venous catheter care for the patient with cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline.
J Clin Oncol. 2013 Apr 1;31(10):1357-70. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.45.5733. Epub 2013 Mar 4.
5
Safety and effectiveness of central venous catheterization in patients with cancer: prospective observational study.
J Korean Med Sci. 2010 Dec;25(12):1748-53. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2010.25.12.1748. Epub 2010 Nov 24.
7
Infectious complications of peripherally inserted central venous catheters in children.
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2010 May;29(5):426-9. doi: 10.1097/INF.0b013e3181c94d9e.
8
Pulmonary artery pseudoaneurysm after a vascular access port catheter implantation.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2009 Jan;87(1):295-7. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.05.061.
9
Influence of insertion site on central venous catheter colonization and bloodstream infection rates.
Intensive Care Med. 2008 Jun;34(6):1038-45. doi: 10.1007/s00134-008-1046-3. Epub 2008 Mar 4.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验