Suppr超能文献

增加肩峰斜位投照可提高成人急性创伤性肩部异常的检出率。

Addition of the apical oblique projection increases the detection of acute traumatic shoulder abnormalities in adults.

作者信息

Ross Kimberley J, Tomkinson Grant R, McGregor Bonnie F, Ayres Oliver C, Piscitelli Diana

机构信息

School of Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, 5000, Australia.

Department of Medical Imaging, Flinders Medical Centre, Bedford Park, 5042, Australia.

出版信息

Emerg Radiol. 2017 Aug;24(4):329-334. doi: 10.1007/s10140-017-1483-9. Epub 2017 Feb 1.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Plain radiographic evaluation of acute shoulder trauma in adults requires a minimum of two projections, commonly the anteroposterior (AP) and lateral scapular projections, with additional projections taken for diagnosis. The aim of this retrospective study was to determine whether the addition of the apical oblique (AO) projection to the AP and lateral scapular projections increases the number and/or alters the types of abnormalities detected in the examination of acute shoulder trauma.

METHODS

Examinations of 56 adults who had undergone three-projection (AP, lateral scapular, AO) radiographic shoulder examination for acute trauma were allocated into two-projection (AP, lateral scapular) and three-projection cases and assessed by a radiologist. The differences in number and types of abnormalities between the two-projection and three-projection cases were quantified using the one-tailed t test and chi-square goodness-of-fit test, respectively.

RESULTS

Test-retest reliability was moderate (intra-class correlation coefficient [95%CI], 0.56 [0.15 to 0.80]) for number, and almost perfect (kappa [95%CI], 0.94 [0.85 to 1.00]) for types, of abnormalities detected. There was a significant increase in the number of abnormalities detected across all three-projection versus two-projection cases (difference in means [95%CI], 0.20 [0.01 to 0.39]) and for fractures (difference in means [95%CI], 0.30 [0.11 to 0.49]), but no difference in the types of abnormalities detected (χ  = 4.7, p = 0.19).

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that adding the AO projection to two-projection examination of acute shoulder trauma increases the number of abnormalities detected; this has potential implications for patient management. Further research investigating differences in types of abnormalities detected between two-projection and three-projection cases is warranted.

摘要

目的

对成人急性肩部创伤进行X线平片评估时,通常至少需要两个投照位,一般为前后位(AP)和肩胛骨侧位投照,必要时还需加拍其他投照位以辅助诊断。本项回顾性研究的目的是确定在AP位和肩胛骨侧位投照基础上增加尖顶斜位(AO)投照是否会增加急性肩部创伤检查中所发现异常的数量和/或改变异常的类型。

方法

对56例因急性创伤接受了包括AP位、肩胛骨侧位和AO位三个投照位肩部X线检查的成人患者进行分组,分为接受两个投照位(AP位、肩胛骨侧位)检查和三个投照位检查的两组,并由一名放射科医生进行评估。分别采用单尾t检验和卡方拟合优度检验对两个投照位组和三个投照位组之间异常数量和类型的差异进行量化分析。

结果

对于所检测到的异常数量,重测信度为中等(组内相关系数[95%CI],0.56[0.15至0.80]);对于所检测到的异常类型,重测信度几乎为完美(kappa[95%CI],0.94[0.85至1.00])。与两个投照位组相比,三个投照位组所检测到的异常数量显著增加(均值差异[95%CI],0.20[0.01至0.39]),骨折方面也是如此(均值差异[95%CI],0.30[0.11至0.49]),但所检测到的异常类型没有差异(χ² = 4.7,p = 0.19)。

结论

本研究表明,在急性肩部创伤的两个投照位检查基础上增加AO位投照可增加所检测到的异常数量;这可能对患者的治疗管理产生影响。有必要进一步研究两个投照位组和三个投照位组之间所检测到的异常类型差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验