Visveswaran Gautam K, Cohen Marc, Seliem Ahmed, DiVita Michael, McNamara Jonathan K R, Dave Amar, Wasty Najam, Baran David A
Division of Cardiology, Newark Beth Israel Medical Center, Newark, New Jersey.
Division of Internal Medicine, Newark Beth Israel Medical Center, Newark, New Jersey.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Oct 1;90(4):E63-E72. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26908. Epub 2017 Feb 1.
Clinical outcomes and adverse events utilizing the large volume 50cc intra-aortic balloon (IAB) in contemporary clinical practice.
The newer large volume 50cc IAB, recently introduced into clinical practice offers improved diastolic augmentation and better left ventricular (LV) unloading compared to the older 40cc IAB.
In 150 consecutive patients who received intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation (IABC) with a 50cc balloon from 2011 to 2015, we retrospectively analyzed demographic, clinical, laboratory, and hemodynamic variables, adverse events and survival to discharge from index hospitalization.
Median LVEF was 20%. The most common indication was cardiogenic shock (CS) in 100 patients. Median duration of IABC was 92.5 hr. 95% of patients were free of any IAB device related complications. Five patients received a transfusion for bleeding causally related to IABC. 70 of the 150 patients who received MCS with IABC with no escalation of therapy, recovered and were discharged alive. Fifteen patients were stabilized on IABC and bridged to orthotopic heart transplant. All 15 were discharged alive. Thirty-four patients were initiated on IABC and escalated to VAD and/or Impella/Tandem Heart, with 24 patients surviving to hospital discharge. Overall survival to hospital discharge for the 150 patients was 72.7%.
IABC using a larger volume 50cc balloon appears effective as a first line percutaneous MCS strategy in a large fraction of critically ill cardiac patients with few adverse events. A large scale registry or randomized clinical trial utilizing the larger volume IAB is needed to validate our results. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
在当代临床实践中使用大容量50cc主动脉内球囊(IAB)的临床结局和不良事件。
最近引入临床实践的新型大容量50cc IAB与旧的40cc IAB相比,舒张期增强效果更好,左心室(LV)卸载效果更佳。
在2011年至2015年期间接受50cc球囊主动脉内球囊反搏(IABC)的150例连续患者中,我们回顾性分析了人口统计学、临床、实验室和血流动力学变量、不良事件以及首次住院出院时的生存率。
左心室射血分数(LVEF)中位数为20%。最常见的适应证是100例心源性休克(CS)患者。IABC的中位持续时间为92.5小时。95%的患者未发生任何与IAB装置相关的并发症。5例患者因与IABC因果相关的出血接受输血。150例接受IABC进行机械循环支持(MCS)且未升级治疗的患者中,70例康复并存活出院。15例患者在IABC支持下病情稳定,并过渡到原位心脏移植。所有15例均存活出院。34例患者开始接受IABC治疗,随后升级为心室辅助装置(VAD)和/或Impella/Tandem Heart,其中24例患者存活至出院。150例患者的总体出院生存率为72.7%。
使用50cc大容量球囊的IABC作为一线经皮MCS策略,在大部分危重心脏病患者中似乎有效,不良事件较少。需要进行一项使用大容量IAB的大规模注册研究或随机临床试验来验证我们的结果。© 2017威利期刊公司