Suppr超能文献

主动脉内球囊反搏术在高危经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的应用:定义冠状动脉反应者。

Intra-aortic Balloon Counterpulsation for High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Defining Coronary Responders.

机构信息

School of Cardiovascular Medicine and Sciences, British Heart Foundation Centre of Excellence and National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, St. Thomas' Hospital Campus, King's College London, London, SE1 7EH, UK.

Bristol Heart Institute, University Hospitals Bristol and University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.

出版信息

J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2019 Aug;12(4):299-309. doi: 10.1007/s12265-019-09871-8. Epub 2019 Mar 15.

Abstract

The effect of intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation (IABC) varies, and it is unknown whether this is due to a heterogeneous coronary physiological response. This study aimed to characterise the coronary and left ventricular (LV) effects of IABC and define responders in terms of their invasive physiology. Twenty-seven patients (LVEF 31 ± 9%) underwent coronary pressure and Doppler flow measurements in the target vessel and acquisition of LV pressure volume loops after IABC supported PCI, with and without IABC assistance. Through coronary wave intensity analysis, perfusion efficiency (PE) was calculated as the proportion of total wave energy comprised of accelerating waves, with responders defined as those with an increase in PE with IABC. The myocardial supply/demand ratio was defined as the ratio between coronary flow and LV pressure volume area (PVA). Responders (44.4%) were more likely to have undergone complex PCI (p = 0.03) with a higher pre-PCI disease burden (p = 0.02) and had lower unassisted mean arterial (87.4 ± 11.0 vs. 77.8 ± 11.6 mmHg, p = 0.04) and distal coronary pressures (88.0 ± 11.0 vs. 71.6 ± 12.4 mmHg, p < 0.001). There was no effect overall of IABC on the myocardial supply/demand ratio (p = 0.34). IABC has minimal effect on demand, but there is marked heterogeneity in the coronary response to IABC, with the greatest response observed in those patients with the most disordered autoregulation.

摘要

主动脉内球囊反搏(IABC)的效果因人而异,目前尚不清楚这是否是由于冠状动脉生理反应存在异质性。本研究旨在描述 IABC 对冠状动脉和左心室(LV)的影响,并根据其侵入性生理学定义反应者。27 例患者(LVEF 31±9%)在接受 IABC 支持的 PCI 后,在靶血管中进行了冠状动脉压力和多普勒血流测量,并在有无 IABC 辅助的情况下采集了 LV 压力-容积环。通过冠状动脉波强度分析,计算出加速波所包含的总波能量的比例作为灌注效率(PE),将 IABC 后 PE 增加的患者定义为反应者。心肌供需比定义为冠状动脉血流与 LV 压力-容积面积(PVA)之比。反应者(44.4%)更有可能接受复杂 PCI(p=0.03),且 PCI 前疾病负担更高(p=0.02),并且无辅助平均动脉压(87.4±11.0 对 77.8±11.6 mmHg,p=0.04)和远端冠状动脉压(88.0±11.0 对 71.6±12.4 mmHg,p<0.001)更低。IABC 对心肌供需比总体无影响(p=0.34)。IABC 对需求的影响很小,但 IABC 对冠状动脉的反应存在明显异质性,在自主调节最紊乱的患者中观察到最大反应。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c0b/6708049/e3e39a3b9c74/12265_2019_9871_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验