van Bladel Anke, Lambrecht Gert, Oostra Kristine M, Vanderstraeten Guy, Cambier Dirk
Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium -
Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium -
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2017 Jun;53(3):400-409. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.17.04368-4. Epub 2017 Jan 30.
Arm slings are often used in clinical practice to support the hemiplegic arm aiming to prevent or treat glenohumeral subluxation. Evidence supporting the corrective effect of slings on subluxation is scarce and long-term studies are lacking.
The aim of this study was to determine both the immediate and long-term effect on acromiohumeral distance using the Actimove® sling and Shoulderlift and to determine the effect of slings on pain and passive range of motion of the shoulder in stroke patients with glenohumeral subluxation.
Randomized control trial.
Hospital inpatients.
Stroke patients.
Twenty-eight stroke patients, with severe upper limb impairments, were randomly allocated to 3 groups (Actimove, Shoulderlift, No sling). Patients wore their supportive device for 6 weeks and no sling in the control group. Immediate and postinterventional effect on acromiohumeral distance was measured using sonography. Pain (VAS), ROM (goniometry), spasticity (Modified Ashworth Scale), Fugl-Meyer Assessment and trunk stability (TIS) were also assessed before and after the intervention.
The level of immediate correction of both slings was different at baseline and after 6 weeks (0 weeks: Shoulderlift 63%, Actimove 36%; 6 weeks: Shoulderlift 28%, Actimove 24%). Comparing the level of subluxation over time shows a distinct decrease in subluxation but only for the control group (-37.59% or 3.30 mm). Subluxation remained the same in the Actimove group (-2.77% or 0.27 mm) but increased in the Shoulderlift group (+12.44% or 1.03 mm). After 6 weeks, the Actimove group reported more pain at rest (P=0.036). ROM for abduction and external rotation decreased in 2 groups and remained un-altered in the Shoulderlift group.
Results of immediate correction varied. Subluxation seemed to reduce in patients that did not wear a sling.
The (assumed) presence of subluxation may not benefit from wearing an arm sling which may itself inhibit active correction. If a sling is indicated the Shoulderlift may be preferable to the Actimove sling.
在临床实践中,手臂吊带常被用于支撑偏瘫手臂,旨在预防或治疗肩肱关节半脱位。支持吊带对半脱位具有矫正作用的证据稀少,且缺乏长期研究。
本研究旨在确定使用Actimove®吊带和Shoulderlift吊带对肩峰肱骨头距离的即时和长期影响,并确定吊带对患有肩肱关节半脱位的中风患者肩部疼痛和被动活动范围的影响。
随机对照试验。
医院住院患者。
中风患者。
28例患有严重上肢功能障碍的中风患者被随机分为3组(Actimove组、Shoulderlift组、无吊带组)。患者佩戴其支撑装置6周,对照组不使用吊带。使用超声测量干预前后肩峰肱骨头距离的即时和干预后效果。还在干预前后评估疼痛(视觉模拟评分法)、活动范围(量角器测量)、痉挛(改良Ashworth量表)、Fugl-Meyer评估和躯干稳定性(TIS)。
两种吊带的即时矫正水平在基线时和6周后有所不同(0周:Shoulderlift组63%,Actimove组36%;6周:Shoulderlift组28%,Actimove组24%)。比较不同时间的半脱位水平显示,半脱位明显减少,但仅在对照组(-37.59%或3.30毫米)。Actimove组半脱位保持不变(-2.77%或0.27毫米),而Shoulderlift组半脱位增加(+12.44%或1.03毫米)。6周后,Actimove组报告静息时疼痛更明显(P = 0.036)。外展和外旋的活动范围在2组中减小,在Shoulderlift组中保持不变。
即时矫正结果各不相同。未佩戴吊带的患者半脱位似乎有所减轻。
(假设的)半脱位状态可能无法从佩戴手臂吊带中获益,吊带本身可能会抑制主动矫正。如果需要使用吊带,Shoulderlift吊带可能比Actimove吊带更可取。