Pérez Trinidad, Fernández Margarita, Hammer Sabine E, Domínguez Ana
Departamento de Biología Funcional, Universidad de Oviedo, Julián Clavería 6, Oviedo, Spain.
Department of Pathobiology, Institute of Immunology, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Veterinaerplatz 1, Vienna, Austria.
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 1;12(2):e0170392. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170392. eCollection 2017.
The inferred phylogenetic relationships between organisms often depend on the molecular marker studied due to the diverse evolutionary mode and unlike evolutionary histories of different parts of the genome. Previous studies have shown conflicting patterns of differentiation of mtDNA and several nuclear markers in chamois (genus Rupicapra) that indicate a complex evolutionary picture. Chamois are mountain caprine that inhabit most of the medium to high altitude mountain ranges of southern Eurasia. The most accepted taxonomical classification considers two species, R. pyrenaica (with the subspecies parva, pyrenaica and ornata) from southwestern Europe and R. rupicapra (with the subspecies cartusiana, rupicapra, tatrica, carpatica, balcanica, asiatica and caucasica) from northeastern Europe. Phylogenies of mtDNA revealed three very old clades (from the early Pleistocene, 1.9 Mya) with a clear geographical signal. Here we analyze a set of 23 autosomal introns, comprising 15,411 nucleotides, in 14 individuals covering the 10 chamois subspecies. Introns offered an evolutionary scenario that contrasts with mtDNA. The nucleotidic diversity was 0.0013± 0.0002, at the low range of what is found in other mammals even if a single species is considered. A coalescent multilocus analysis with *BEAST indicated that introns diversified 88 Kya, in the late Pleistocene, and the effective population size at the root was lower than 10,000 individuals. The dispersal of some few migrant males should have rapidly spread trough the populations of chamois, given the homogeneity of intron sequences. The striking differences between mitochondrial and nuclear markers can be attributed to strong female philopatry and extensive male dispersal. Our results highlight the need of analyzing multiple and varied genome components to capture the complex evolutionary history of organisms.
由于进化模式多样且基因组不同部分具有不同的进化历史,生物体之间推断出的系统发育关系通常取决于所研究的分子标记。先前的研究表明,岩羚羊(岩羚羊属)的线粒体DNA和几个核标记存在相互矛盾的分化模式,这表明进化情况复杂。岩羚羊是生活在欧亚大陆南部大部分中高海拔山脉的山羊。最被认可的分类学分类认为有两个物种,即来自欧洲西南部的比利牛斯岩羚羊(有亚种parva、pyrenaica和ornata)和来自欧洲东北部的岩羚羊(有亚种cartusiana、rupicapra、tatrica、carpatica、balcanica、asiatica和caucasica)。线粒体DNA的系统发育揭示了三个非常古老的分支(始于早更新世,190万年前),具有明显的地理信号。在这里,我们分析了一组23个常染色体内含子,包含15411个核苷酸,涉及14个个体,涵盖了10个岩羚羊亚种。内含子提供了一种与线粒体DNA不同的进化情况。核苷酸多样性为0.0013±0.0002,即使只考虑一个物种,也处于其他哺乳动物中发现的低水平范围。使用*BEAST进行的合并多位点分析表明,内含子在晚更新世8.8万年前开始分化,根部的有效种群大小低于10000个个体。鉴于内含子序列的同质性,少数迁移雄性的扩散应该迅速在岩羚羊种群中传播开来。线粒体和核标记之间的显著差异可归因于强烈的雌性留居和广泛的雄性扩散。我们的结果强调了分析多个不同基因组成分以捕捉生物体复杂进化历史的必要性。