• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项关于学区反欺凌政策质量与学生欺凌行为参与情况的全州范围多层次调查。

A Multilevel, Statewide Investigation of School District Anti-Bullying Policy Quality and Student Bullying Involvement.

作者信息

Gower Amy L, Cousin Molly, Borowsky Iris W

机构信息

Division of General Pediatrics and Adolescent Health, Department of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota, 717 Delaware Street SE, Minneapolis, MN 55414.

Sixteenth Street Community Health Center, 1337 South Cesar E Chavez Drive, Milwaukee, WI 53204.

出版信息

J Sch Health. 2017 Mar;87(3):174-181. doi: 10.1111/josh.12480.

DOI:10.1111/josh.12480
PMID:28147459
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although nearly all states in the United States require school districts to adopt anti-bullying policies, little research examines the effect of these policies on student bullying and health. Using a statewide sample, we investigated associations between the quality of school district anti-bullying policies and student bullying involvement and adjustment.

METHODS

School district anti-bullying policies (N = 208) were coded for their quality based on established criteria. District-level data were combined with student reports of bullying involvement, emotional distress, and school connectedness from a state surveillance survey of 6th, 9th, and 12th grade students (N = 93,437).

RESULTS

Results indicated that policy quality was positively related to bullying victimization. Furthermore, students reporting frequent perpetration/victimization who also attended districts with high-quality policies reported more emotional distress and less school connectedness compared with students attending districts with low quality policies. Although statistically significant, the magnitude of these associations was small.

CONCLUSIONS

Having a high-quality school district anti-bullying policy is not sufficient to reduce bullying and protect bullying-involved young people. Future studies examining policy implementation will inform best practices in bullying prevention.

摘要

背景

尽管美国几乎所有州都要求学区采用反欺凌政策,但很少有研究考察这些政策对学生欺凌行为和健康的影响。我们使用一个全州范围的样本,调查了学区反欺凌政策的质量与学生欺凌行为参与度及适应情况之间的关联。

方法

根据既定标准对学区反欺凌政策(N = 208)的质量进行编码。将学区层面的数据与来自对6年级、9年级和12年级学生的州监测调查(N = 93,437)中有关学生欺凌行为参与度、情绪困扰和学校归属感的报告相结合。

结果

结果表明,政策质量与受欺凌情况呈正相关。此外,与就读于政策质量低的学区的学生相比,那些报告经常实施欺凌/受欺凌且就读于政策质量高的学区的学生报告了更多的情绪困扰和更低的学校归属感。尽管这些关联在统计学上具有显著性,但关联程度较小。

结论

拥有高质量的学区反欺凌政策不足以减少欺凌行为并保护受欺凌的青少年。未来关于政策实施的研究将为预防欺凌的最佳实践提供信息。

相似文献

1
A Multilevel, Statewide Investigation of School District Anti-Bullying Policy Quality and Student Bullying Involvement.一项关于学区反欺凌政策质量与学生欺凌行为参与情况的全州范围多层次调查。
J Sch Health. 2017 Mar;87(3):174-181. doi: 10.1111/josh.12480.
2
School Practices to Foster LGBT-Supportive Climate: Associations with Adolescent Bullying Involvement.学校实践以培育 LGBT 友好氛围:与青少年欺凌卷入的关联。
Prev Sci. 2018 Aug;19(6):813-821. doi: 10.1007/s11121-017-0847-4.
3
Are school policies focused on sexual orientation and gender identity associated with less bullying? Teachers' perspectives.关注性取向和性别认同的学校政策是否与较少的欺凌行为相关?教师的观点。
J Sch Psychol. 2016 Feb;54:29-38. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2015.10.005. Epub 2015 Nov 27.
4
Personal, family, school, and community factors associated with student victimization by teachers in Taiwanese junior high schools: A multi-informant and multilevel analysis.个人、家庭、学校和社区因素与台湾初中学生受教师侵害的关系:多信息源和多层次分析。
Child Abuse Negl. 2020 Jan;99:104246. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2019.104246. Epub 2019 Nov 19.
5
School-level contextual predictors of bullying and harassment experiences among adolescents.青少年中欺凌和骚扰经历的学校层面背景预测因素。
Soc Sci Med. 2015 Dec;147:47-53. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.10.036. Epub 2015 Oct 19.
6
Anti-bullying Policies and Disparities in Bullying: A State-Level Analysis.反欺凌政策与欺凌现象的差异:一项州级分析。
Am J Prev Med. 2017 Aug;53(2):184-191. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2017.02.004. Epub 2017 Apr 17.
7
Associations Between Peer Harassment and School Risk and Protection Profiles.同伴骚扰与学校风险及保护特征之间的关联。
J Sch Health. 2017 Nov;87(11):832-841. doi: 10.1111/josh.12557.
8
Can schools reduce bullying? The relationship between school characteristics and the prevalence of bullying behaviours.学校能减少欺凌行为吗?学校特征与欺凌行为发生率之间的关系。
Br J Educ Psychol. 2017 Jun;87(2):255-272. doi: 10.1111/bjep.12148. Epub 2017 Feb 21.
9
School Leadership and Cyberbullying-A Multilevel Analysis.学校领导力与网络欺凌——多层次分析
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Oct 15;14(10):1226. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14101226.
10
School violence and bullying among sexual minority high school students, 2009-2011.性少数群体高中生中的校园暴力和欺凌,2009-2011 年。
J Adolesc Health. 2014 Sep;55(3):432-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2014.03.002. Epub 2014 Apr 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Building a Safe Sports Environment: Coaches' Strategies for Peer Bullying Prevention.构建安全的运动环境:教练预防同伴欺凌的策略
J Prev (2022). 2025 May 18. doi: 10.1007/s10935-025-00853-y.
2
The Role of Bullying-Related Policies: Understanding How School Staff Respond to Bullying Situations.与欺凌相关政策的作用:了解学校工作人员如何应对欺凌情况。
Eur J Dev Psychol. 2021;18(6):880-895. doi: 10.1080/17405629.2021.1889503. Epub 2021 Feb 25.
3
Bullying and Pain in School-Aged Children and Adolescents: A Cross-Sectional Study.学龄儿童和青少年中的欺凌与疼痛:一项横断面研究
SAGE Open Nurs. 2019 Nov 10;5:2377960819887556. doi: 10.1177/2377960819887556. eCollection 2019 Jan-Dec.
4
Socioeconomic Effects in Cyberbullying: Global Research Trends in the Educational Context.网络欺凌的社会经济影响:教育背景下的全球研究趋势。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jun 18;17(12):4369. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17124369.
5
School-Level Factors Associated with Sun Protection Practices in California Elementary Schools.学校层面因素与加利福尼亚州小学的防晒措施实践相关。
J Sch Health. 2020 May;90(5):386-394. doi: 10.1111/josh.12884. Epub 2020 Mar 6.
6
All Things in Moderation? Threshold Effects in Adolescent Extracurricular Participation Intensity and Behavioral Problems.适度即完美?青少年课外参与强度与行为问题的阈限效应。
J Sch Health. 2019 Feb;89(2):79-87. doi: 10.1111/josh.12715.