Yu Tsung-Hsien, Tung Yu-Chi, Wei Chung-Jen
1 National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Sciences, Taiwan.
2 National Taiwan University, Taipei City, Taiwan.
Inquiry. 2017 Jan;54:46958017690289. doi: 10.1177/0046958017690289.
Different approaches to measure the hospital competition index might lead to inconsistent results of the effects of hospital competition on innovation adoption. The purpose of this study is to adopt a different approach to define market area and measure the level of competition to examine whether hospital competition has a positive effect on hospital behavior, taking quality indicator projects participation as an example. A total of 238 hospitals located in Taipei, Taichung, and Kaohsiung were recruited in this study. Competition index was used as the independent variable, and participation lists of Taiwan Clinical Performance Indicator and Taiwan Healthcare Indicator Series in 2012 were used as dependent variables. All data used in this study were retrieved from the 2012 national hospital profiles and the participation list of the 2 quality indicator projects in 2012; these profiles are issued by the Taiwan Ministry of Health and Welfare annually. Geopolitical boundaries and 4 kinds of fixed radiuses were used to define market area. Herfindahl-Hirschman Index and hospital density were used to measure the level of competition. A total of 12 competition indices were produced in this study by employing the geographic information system, while max-rescaled R was used to evaluate and compare the models on goodness of fit. The results show that the effects of hospital competition on quality indicator projects participation were varied, which mean different indicators for market competition might reveal different conclusions. Furthermore, this study also found the Herfindahl-Hirschman Index at 5-km radius was the optimum competition index.
衡量医院竞争指数的不同方法可能会导致医院竞争对创新采用效果的结果不一致。本研究的目的是采用一种不同的方法来定义市场区域并衡量竞争水平,以质量指标项目参与情况为例,检验医院竞争是否对医院行为有积极影响。本研究共招募了位于台北、台中及高雄的238家医院。竞争指数作为自变量,2012年台湾临床绩效指标和台湾医疗指标系列的参与清单作为因变量。本研究中使用的所有数据均取自2012年国家医院概况以及2012年两个质量指标项目的参与清单;这些概况由台湾卫生福利部每年发布。利用地缘政治边界和4种固定半径来定义市场区域。使用赫芬达尔-赫希曼指数和医院密度来衡量竞争水平。本研究通过运用地理信息系统共生成了12个竞争指数,同时使用最大重新标度R来评估和比较模型的拟合优度。结果表明,医院竞争对质量指标项目参与的影响各不相同,这意味着不同的市场竞争指标可能会揭示不同的结论。此外,本研究还发现5公里半径的赫芬达尔-赫希曼指数是最佳竞争指数。