• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

假设生成对规则发现任务中假设检验的影响。

Effects of Hypothesis Generation on Hypothesis Testing in Rule-Discovery Tasks.

作者信息

Adsit Dennis J, London Manuel

机构信息

a Rath & Strong.

b SUNY-Stony Brook.

出版信息

J Gen Psychol. 1997 Jan;124(1):19-34. doi: 10.1080/00221309709595505.

DOI:10.1080/00221309709595505
PMID:28147902
Abstract

The extent to which hypothesis generation affects hypothesis-testing performance was examined in a rule-discovery task. One hundred eight undergraduates enrolled in introductory psychology were randomly assigned to conditions in which the participants, experimenter, other participants, or no one generated hypotheses before the participants were tested on three different tasks. Hypothesis-testing performance in the experimenter-supplied condition was significantly higher than in the other conditions, suggesting that generating a list of hypotheses does not in itself improve hypothesis-testing performance. Among participants who generated hypotheses, those who generated the correct hypothesis before beginning the testing were more likely to solve the problem, suggesting that poor hypothesis-generation abilities might be a barrier to hypothesis-testing performance.

摘要

在一项规则发现任务中,研究了假设生成对假设检验表现的影响程度。108名修读心理学导论课程的本科生被随机分配到不同条件下,在这些条件中,参与者、实验者、其他参与者或无人在参与者进行三项不同任务测试之前生成假设。实验者提供假设条件下的假设检验表现显著高于其他条件,这表明生成一系列假设本身并不能提高假设检验表现。在生成假设的参与者中,那些在开始测试前生成正确假设的人更有可能解决问题,这表明较差的假设生成能力可能是假设检验表现的一个障碍。

相似文献

1
Effects of Hypothesis Generation on Hypothesis Testing in Rule-Discovery Tasks.假设生成对规则发现任务中假设检验的影响。
J Gen Psychol. 1997 Jan;124(1):19-34. doi: 10.1080/00221309709595505.
2
Hypothesis testing in a rule discovery problem: when a focused procedure is effective.规则发现问题中的假设检验:聚焦程序何时有效。
Q J Exp Psychol A. 2001 Feb;54(1):263-7. doi: 10.1080/02724980042000101.
3
Distrust and the positive test heuristic: dispositional and situated social distrust improves performance on the Wason rule discovery task.
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2014 Jun;143(3):985-90. doi: 10.1037/a0035127. Epub 2013 Nov 25.
4
Effectiveness of Positive Hypothesis Testing in Inductive and Deductive Rule Learning.积极假设检验在归纳与演绎规则学习中的有效性。
Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1999 Feb;77(2):130-146. doi: 10.1006/obhd.1998.2815.
5
Utilities in the 2-4-6 task.2-4-6任务中的效用
Exp Psychol. 2012 Jan 1;59(5):265-71. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000152.
6
Generation of hypotheses in Wason's 2-4-6 task: an information theory approach.在沃森的2-4-6任务中生成假设:一种信息论方法。
Q J Exp Psychol A. 2005 Feb;58(2):309-32. doi: 10.1080/02724980343000891.
7
Dual-goal facilitation in Wason's 2-4-6 task: what mediates successful rule discovery?沃森2-4-6任务中的双重目标促进:什么因素介导了成功的规则发现?
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2006 May;59(5):873-85. doi: 10.1080/02724980543000051.
8
Creativity and inductive reasoning: the relationship between divergent thinking and performance on Wasons 246 task.创造力与归纳推理:发散性思维与沃森246任务表现之间的关系。
Q J Exp Psychol A. 2003 May;56(4):641-55. doi: 10.1080/02724980244000567.
9
Assessing planning and set-shifting abilities in autism: are experimenter-administered and computerised versions of tasks equivalent?评估自闭症患者的计划和转换能力:实验者管理的和计算机化的任务版本是否等效?
Autism Res. 2013 Dec;6(6):461-7. doi: 10.1002/aur.1311. Epub 2013 Jul 26.
10
Satisficing in hypothesis generation.假设生成中的满意策略。
Am J Psychol. 2002 Winter;115(4):475-500.