Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Maryland , College Park, Maryland 20742, United States.
NIST Center for Neutron Research, National Institute of Standards and Technology , Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899, United States.
J Phys Chem B. 2017 Feb 16;121(6):1340-1351. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.6b11425. Epub 2017 Feb 2.
Nanocellulose extracted from wood pulps using TEMPO (2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine-1-oxyl radical)-mediated oxidation and sulfuric acid hydrolysis methods was characterized by small-angle neutron scattering (SANS), small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS), and dynamic light scattering (DLS) techniques. The dimensions of this nanocellulose (TEMPO-oxidized cellulose nanofiber (TOCN) and sulfuric acid hydrolyzed cellulose nanocrystal (SACN)) revealed by the different scattering methods were compared with those characterized by transmission electron microscopy (TEM). The SANS and SAXS data were analyzed using a parallelepiped-based form factor. The width and thickness of the nanocellulose cross section were ∼8 and ∼2 nm for TOCN and ∼20 and ∼3 nm for SACN, respectively, where the fitting results from SANS and SAXS profiles were consistent with each other. DLS was carried out under both the V mode with the polarizer and analyzer parallel to each other and the H mode having them perpendicular to each other. Using rotational and translational diffusion coefficients obtained under the H mode yielded a nanocellulose length qualitatively consistent with that observed by TEM, whereas the length derived by the translational diffusion coefficient under the V mode appeared to be overestimated.
采用 TEMPO(2,2,6,6-四甲基哌啶-1-氧自由基)介导的氧化和硫酸水解方法从木浆中提取的纳米纤维素,采用小角中子散射(SANS)、小角 X 射线散射(SAXS)和动态光散射(DLS)技术进行了表征。通过不同的散射方法揭示的这种纳米纤维素(TEMPO 氧化纤维素纳米纤维(TOCN)和硫酸水解纤维素纳米晶体(SACN))的尺寸与透射电子显微镜(TEM)所表征的尺寸进行了比较。使用基于平行六面体的形状因子对 SANS 和 SAXS 数据进行了分析。TOCN 的纳米纤维素横截面的宽度和厚度分别约为 8nm 和 2nm,而 SACN 的分别约为 20nm 和 3nm,其中 SANS 和 SAXS 谱线的拟合结果相互一致。在 V 模式(偏振器和分析器彼此平行)和 H 模式(彼此垂直)下进行了 DLS。使用 H 模式下获得的旋转和平移扩散系数得到的纳米纤维素长度与 TEM 观察到的长度定性一致,而在 V 模式下通过平移扩散系数得出的长度似乎被高估了。