Suppr超能文献

临终关怀共享照护对胃癌患者的影响。

The effects of hospice-shared care for gastric cancer patients.

作者信息

Huang Kun-Siang, Wang Shih-Ho, Chuah Seng-Kee, Rau Kun-Ming, Lin Yu-Hung, Hsieh Meng-Che, Shih Li-Hsueh, Chen Yen-Hao

机构信息

Department of Family Medicine, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.

Division of General surgery, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2017 Feb 3;12(2):e0171365. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0171365. eCollection 2017.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Hospice care has been proved to result in changes to the medical behaviors of terminally ill patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects and medical behavior changes of hospice-shared care intervention among terminally ill gastric cancer patients.

METHODS

A total of 174 patients who died of gastric cancer between 2012 and 2014 were identified. These patients were divided into two groups: a hospice-shared care group (n = 93) and a control group (n = 81).

RESULTS

Among the 174 patients, 84% had advanced stage (stage III or stage IV) cancer. The females and the patients cared by medical oncologists had a higher percentage of hospice-shared care than the males (71% vs 44%, p = 0.001) and those cared by other physicians (63% vs 41%, p = 0.004). Compared to the control group, the hospice-shared care group underwent lower incidence of life sustaining or aggressive medical treatments, including intensive care unit admission (2% vs 26%, p<0.001), intubation (1% vs 27%, p<0.001), cardiopulmonary-cerebral resuscitation (0% vs 11%, p = 0.001), ventilator use (1% vs 27%, p<0.001), inotropic agent use (8% vs 46%, p<0.001), total or partial parenteral nutrition use (38% vs. 58%, p = 0.029), and blood transfusion (45% vs 74%, p<0.001). Besides, the hospice-shared care group had a higher percentage of palliative treatments than the control group, including signed Do-Not-Resuscitate (DNR) orders (95% vs 37%, p<0.001), receiving home hospice care (16% vs 1%, p<0.001), and indicating home as the realistically preferred place of death (41% vs 19%, p = 0.001). The hospice ward admission rate in the hospice-shared care group increased from 30% to 53% from 2012 to 2014.

CONCLUSION

The use of hospice-shared care for gastric cancer patients could increase the rate of signed DNR orders, decrease the use of life sustaining and aggressive/palliative treatments, and improve quality of life.

摘要

背景

临终关怀已被证明会导致晚期患者医疗行为的改变。本研究的目的是评估临终关怀共享护理干预对晚期胃癌患者的影响及医疗行为变化。

方法

确定了2012年至2014年间共174例死于胃癌的患者。这些患者被分为两组:临终关怀共享护理组(n = 93)和对照组(n = 81)。

结果

在这174例患者中,84%患有晚期(III期或IV期)癌症。女性患者以及由肿瘤内科医生护理的患者接受临终关怀共享护理的比例高于男性(71%对44%,p = 0.001)以及由其他医生护理的患者(63%对41%,p = 0.004)。与对照组相比,临终关怀共享护理组接受维持生命或积极医疗治疗的发生率较低,包括入住重症监护病房(2%对26%,p<0.001)、插管(1%对27%,p<0.001)、心肺脑复苏(0%对11%,p = 0.001)、使用呼吸机(1%对27%,p<0.001)、使用血管活性药物(8%对46%,p<0.001)、全肠外或部分肠外营养的使用(38%对58%,p = 0.029)以及输血(45%对74%,p<0.001)。此外,临终关怀共享护理组接受姑息治疗的比例高于对照组,包括签署不进行心肺复苏(DNR)医嘱(95%对37%,p<0.001)、接受居家临终关怀护理(16%对1%,p<0.001)以及表示希望在家中离世(41%对19%,p = 0.001)。临终关怀共享护理组的临终关怀病房入住率从2012年的30%上升至2014年的53%。

结论

对胃癌患者采用临终关怀共享护理可提高签署DNR医嘱率,减少维持生命及积极/姑息治疗的使用,并改善生活质量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ca2/5291360/6232782f151a/pone.0171365.g001.jpg

相似文献

1
The effects of hospice-shared care for gastric cancer patients.临终关怀共享照护对胃癌患者的影响。
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 3;12(2):e0171365. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0171365. eCollection 2017.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
Nutrition in Patients with Gastric Cancer: An Update.胃癌患者的营养:最新进展
Gastrointest Tumors. 2016 May;2(4):178-87. doi: 10.1159/000445188. Epub 2016 Apr 13.
3
[Cancer burden in the Jinchang cohort].[金昌队列中的癌症负担]
Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2016 Mar;37(3):306-10. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-6450.2016.03.002.
5
Relationship between palliative care consultation service and end-of-life outcomes.姑息治疗咨询服务与临终结局的关系。
Support Care Cancer. 2016 Jan;24(1):53-60. doi: 10.1007/s00520-015-2741-6. Epub 2015 Apr 26.
6
Global cancer statistics, 2012.全球癌症统计数据,2012 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2015 Mar;65(2):87-108. doi: 10.3322/caac.21262. Epub 2015 Feb 4.
8

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验