Eendebak Robert J A H, Swiecicka Agnieszka, Gromski Piotr S, Pye Stephen R, O'Neill Terence W, Marshall Alan, Keevil Brian G, Tampubolon Gindo, Goodacre Royston, Wu Frederick C W, Rutter Martin K
Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences, Institute of Human Development, Centre for Endocrinology and Diabetes, Andrology Research Unit, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Complex Chemical Systems Group, School of Chemistry, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2017 May;86(5):660-668. doi: 10.1111/cen.13305. Epub 2017 Feb 28.
To assess ethnic differences in male reproductive hormone levels and to determine whether any differences are explained by adiposity, insulin resistance (IR) or comorbidities in older men.
Multi-ethnic cross-sectional observational study.
Community dwelling middle-aged and elderly men residing in the UK aged 40-84 years of South Asian (SA; n = 180), White European (WE; n = 328) or African Caribbean (AC; n = 166) origin.
Measured testosterone (T), calculated free T (cFT), sex hormone-binding globulin and LH in SA, WE and AC men along with an assessment of body composition, IR, lifestyle factors and medical conditions.
Age-adjusted mean T and cFT levels were lower in SA men when compared to WE and AC men (mean (SEM) T: SA: 14·0 ± 0·4; WE: 17·1 ± 0·3; AC: 17·2 ± 0·5 nmol/l, P < 0·001; cFT: SA: 283 ± 7; WE: 313 ± 5; AC: 314 ± 8 pmol/l, P < 0·006). Compared to WE and AC men, SA men had higher levels of body fat, IR, comorbidities and diabetes. After adjusting for body fat, IR and other confounders, T levels in SA men remained lower than in WE men (P = 0·04) but ethnic differences in cFT became nonsignificant. LH levels were higher in SA than WE men in age-adjusted and fully adjusted models.
T and cFT are lower in SA men than in WE and AC men. Whether ethnic-specific reference ranges for T and cFT might be appropriate in clinical practice requires further investigation. Ethnic differences in cFT, but not T, appear to be, more readily, explained by ethnic differences in adiposity, thus providing insights into potential pathophysiological mechanisms.
评估老年男性生殖激素水平的种族差异,并确定肥胖、胰岛素抵抗(IR)或合并症是否能解释这些差异。
多民族横断面观察性研究。
居住在英国的40 - 84岁社区中老年男性,分别为南亚裔(SA;n = 180)、欧洲白人(WE;n = 328)或非洲加勒比裔(AC;n = 166)。
测量SA、WE和AC男性的睾酮(T)、计算游离睾酮(cFT)、性激素结合球蛋白和促黄体生成素(LH),并评估身体成分、IR、生活方式因素和医疗状况。
与WE和AC男性相比,SA男性经年龄调整后的平均T和cFT水平较低(平均(标准误)T:SA:14.0 ± 0.4;WE:17.1 ± 0.3;AC:17.2 ± 0.5 nmol/l,P < 0.001;cFT:SA:283 ±7;WE:313 ± 5;AC:314 ± 8 pmol/l,P < 0.006)。与WE和AC男性相比,SA男性的体脂、IR、合并症和糖尿病水平更高。在调整体脂、IR和其他混杂因素后,SA男性的T水平仍低于WE男性(P = 0.04),但cFT的种族差异变得不显著。在年龄调整和完全调整模型中,SA男性的LH水平高于WE男性。
SA男性的T和cFT低于WE和AC男性。在临床实践中,T和cFT的种族特异性参考范围是否合适需要进一步研究。cFT而非T 的种族差异似乎更容易由肥胖的种族差异来解释,从而为潜在的病理生理机制提供了见解。