Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA.
Department of Speech and Hearing Science, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2017 Jul;8(4). doi: 10.1002/wcs.1434. Epub 2017 Feb 3.
Speech signals provide both linguistic information (e.g., words and sentences) as well as information about the speaker who produced the message (i.e., social-indexical information). Listeners store highly detailed representations of these speech signals, which are simultaneously indexed with linguistic and social category membership. A variety of methodologies-forced-choice categorization, rating, and free classification-have shed light on listeners' cognitive-perceptual representations of the social-indexical information present in the speech signal. Specifically, listeners can accurately identify some talker characteristics, including native language status, approximate age, sex, and gender. Additionally, listeners have sensitivity to other speaker characteristics-such as sexual orientation, regional dialect, native language for non-native speakers, race, and ethnicity-but listeners tend to be less accurate or more variable at categorizing or rating speakers based on these constructs. However, studies have not necessarily incorporated more recent conceptions of these constructs (e.g., separating listeners' perceptions of race vs ethnicity) or speakers who do not fit squarely into specific categories (e.g., for sex perception, intersex individuals; for gender perception, genderqueer speakers; for race perception, multiracial speakers). Additional research on how the intersections of social-indexical categories influence speech perception is also needed. As the field moves forward, scholars from a variety of disciplines should be incorporated into investigations of how listeners' extract and represent facets of personal identity from speech. Further, the impact of these representations on our interactions with one another in contexts outside of the laboratory should continue to be explored. WIREs Cogn Sci 2017, 8:e1434. doi: 10.1002/wcs.1434 This article is categorized under: Linguistics > Language Acquisition Linguistics > Language in Mind and Brain Psychology > Language.
语音信号不仅提供语言信息(如单词和句子),还提供产生信息的说话者的信息(即社会索引信息)。听众存储这些语音信号的高度详细表示,这些表示同时与语言和社会类别成员身份相关联。各种方法——强制选择分类、评分和自由分类——揭示了听众对语音信号中存在的社会索引信息的认知感知表示。具体来说,听众可以准确识别一些说话者特征,包括母语状态、大致年龄、性别和性别。此外,听众对其他说话者特征也有敏感性,例如性取向、地区方言、非母语人士的母语、种族和民族,但听众在根据这些结构对说话者进行分类或评分时往往不太准确或更具变异性。然而,研究并不一定包含这些结构的最新概念(例如,将听众对种族与民族的感知分开)或不符合特定类别(例如,对于性别感知,双性人个体;对于性别感知,性别酷儿说话者;对于种族感知,多种族说话者)的说话者。还需要更多关于社会索引类别交叉如何影响语音感知的研究。随着该领域的发展,来自不同学科的学者应该参与到听众如何从语音中提取和表示个人身份特征的研究中。此外,应该继续探索这些表示对我们在实验室之外的环境中相互作用的影响。WIREs Cogn Sci 2017, 8:e1434. doi: 10.1002/wcs.1434 本文归类于: 语言学 > 语言习得 语言学 > 语言在头脑和大脑中 心理学 > 语言。