Laboratoire I3MTO, Université d'Orléans, 4708, 45067, Orléans, EA, France.
Regional Hospital of Orleans, 14 avenue de l'hopital, 45067, Orleans, Cedex 2, France.
Osteoporos Int. 2017 Jun;28(6):1771-1778. doi: 10.1007/s00198-017-3921-7. Epub 2017 Feb 4.
In clinical practice, areal bone mineral density (aBMD) is usually measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) to assess bone status in patients with or without osteoporotic fracture. As BMD has a Gaussian distribution, it is difficult to define a cutoff for osteoporosis diagnosis. Based on epidemiological considerations, WHO defined a DXA-based osteoporosis diagnosis with a T-score <-2.5. However, the majority of individuals who have low-trauma fractures do not have osteoporosis with DXA (i.e., T-score <-2.5), and some of them have no decreased BMD at all. Some medical conditions (spondyloarthropathies, chronic kidney disease and mineral bone disorder, diabetes, obesity) or drugs (glucocorticoids, aromatase inhibitors) are more prone to cause fractures with subnormal BMD. In the situation of fragility fractures with subnormal or normal BMD, clinicians face a difficulty as almost all the pharmacologic treatments have proved their efficacy in patients with low BMD. However, some data are available in post hoc analyses in patients with T score >-2. Overall, in patients with a previous fragility fracture (especially vertebra or hip), treatments appear to be effective. Thus, the authors recommend treating some patients with a major fragility fracture even if areal BMD T score is above -2.5.
在临床实践中,通常使用双能 X 射线吸收法(DXA)来测量实际骨密度(aBMD),以评估有或无骨质疏松性骨折的患者的骨骼状况。由于骨密度呈正态分布,因此难以定义骨质疏松症诊断的截止值。基于流行病学考虑,世卫组织将基于 DXA 的骨质疏松症诊断定义为 T 评分 <-2.5。然而,大多数发生低创伤性骨折的人并没有 DXA 诊断的骨质疏松症(即 T 评分 <-2.5),其中一些人根本没有骨密度降低。一些医疗状况(脊柱关节炎、慢性肾脏病和矿物质骨异常、糖尿病、肥胖症)或药物(糖皮质激素、芳香酶抑制剂)更容易导致骨密度正常或低于正常的骨折。在骨密度低于或正常的脆性骨折情况下,临床医生面临困难,因为几乎所有的药物治疗都已证明在低骨密度患者中有效。然而,在 T 评分> -2 的患者的事后分析中,有些数据是可用的。总体而言,对于有既往脆性骨折(尤其是椎体或髋部)的患者,治疗似乎有效。因此,作者建议对一些有严重脆性骨折的患者进行治疗,即使实际骨密度 T 评分高于 -2.5。